Close-up of the so-called 'Locust of
Kalisz' drawing, contained in the scrapbook album compiled and given by friends
to General Joachim Daniel von Jauch as a birthday present sometime during the
early 1750s (public domain)
Its many shortcomings and dark aspects
notwithstanding, I have long considered the internet to be the greatest cabinet
of curiosities ever assembled, a limitless repository replete with wonders and
marvels of every conceivable – and inconceivable – kind, all awaiting
uncovering and investigation by those with a mind to do so. Over the years, I
have documented here on ShukerNature an extremely diverse array of my
own cryptozoology-related discoveries made in this manner, of which the present
one is just the latest in a very extensive and – at least for me, but I hope
for you too – a thoroughly entrancing series with no end in sight, thankfully.
And so it was that while idly browsing last night
through the vast virtual art gallery of online images that is freely available via
Wikimedia Commons, I typed 'Cryptozoology' in its search engine bar, and instantly
called up an entertaining selection of pictures appertaining to mystery beasts.
As I browsed through them, I recognised every one with varying degrees of
familiarity – until, that is, I came to the extraordinary drawing that opens
this current ShukerNature article, and was immediately aware that I had
never encountered it before.
As can be seen here,
on Wikimedia Commons this drawing has been entitled 'Szarańcza z Kalisza', which translates from Polish as
'Locust of Kalisz', dates from no earlier than 1749, and is accompanied by the following
description: 'Zmierzchnica trupia główka ze sztambucha generała Joachima
Daniela Jaucha' (very loosely translated via Google Translate as 'the dreaded
head of General Joachim Daniel Jauch on paper'). What can this weird insect be,
who was Joachim Daniel Jauch, and what is their common history? Needless to
say, my sense of cryptozoological curiosity was irresistibly stimulated, and
so, in best Sherlockian response, the game was afoot!
The 'Locust of Kalisz' drawing with its bilingual caption inscribed
below it - click to enlarge (public domain)
My first line of investigation was to translate the
handwritten caption inscribed directly below the drawing itself. It was present
in two separate languages, Old Polish and German, but the script was very faint in
both, the ink having long since faded considerably. Happily, however, with great thanks to the much-welcomed translation skills of Facebook friend Miroslav Fismeister and one of his friends, Polish novelist Daniel Koziarski, for the Old Polish version and the much-appreciated assistance of German cryptozoological friend and colleague Markus Bühler for the German
version, I am able to provide the following English translation:
The year 1749: A plague of locusts
fell a mile from Kalisz, of which two were caught, one was held in Gniezno capital
and the other in the OO. Reformation church in Kalisz. When taken in the hand,
it was screaming like a bat, yellow foam was coming from its mouth, all of it was
hairy, Death on the chest, two hairy legs, squirrel's teeth, etc.
Kalisz is a city in central Poland (and the oldest still existing anywhere
in this country), and Gniezno is a city in central-western Poland that was this country's first capital city. Moreover, the OO. Reformation church in Kalisz was conceivably a Reformed Franciscan church and is apparently now the
Church of the Holy Family there. Sadly, I currently have no information concerning the fate of the two captured specimens – were they preserved and retained somewhere, I wonder, or
simply discarded? Hence I am treating this case as an investigation still in
progress. However, combining the verbal description's details with the visual
details present in the drawing did swiftly enable me to identify the insect. Albeit
exhibiting considerable artistic licence and not a little inaccuracy, whereas the
drawing clearly does not portray a locust it was evidently inspired by Acherontia
atropos – the deathshead hawk moth, one of Europe's largest lepidopterans
(click here
for a ShukerNature blog article devoted to this morphologically and
behaviourally distinctive species).
True, the
characteristic thoracic marking resembling a skull and earning this particular
moth its familiar English name was depicted ventrally rather than dorsally in
this strange drawing, and in it the insect had been given a grinning human face
sporting a decidedly Salvador Dali-esque upward-curving moustache, but this latter
feature may have been intended as a whimsical adaptation of the moth's long
thick antennae. Indeed, in overall appearance the depicted insect definitely seems
to constitute a deliberately comical, humanoid caricature of A. atropos,
which would explain why it was only given two legs (but ending in claws, like a
moth's, rather than human feet), yet incorporating certain unequivocally
Acherontian attributes too, such as the banding upon its rear wings, and its
hairy body. Of particular relevance here is that the creature's alleged bat-like
screaming – ostensibly nonsensical in relation to a moth – is actually a famous,
characteristic feature of this particular moth species For it can emit a
shrill, high-pitched squeaking sound, which is created by the moth's powerful inhalation
of air into its pharynx, causing a stiffened flap called the epipharynx to
vibrate very rapidly (click here for more details).
But what about the
description of the drawing assigned to it on Wikimedia Commons? Clearly
"the dreaded head" means "the deathshead", referring to the
eponymous moth species, but who was General
Joachim Daniel Jauch? I soon discovered that he was General Joachim Daniel von
Jauch (1688-1754), a German-born architect, civilian engineer, and military man,
who had supervised the Baroque development of Warsaw, being responsible for the
urban planning and designing or rebuilding of many of its new buildings, and he
had also served in the Polish army as an artilleryman, steadily rising up
through the ranks. But how was Jauch linked to the humanoid deathshead hawk
moth drawing?
In spite of its very striking, memorable appearance,
this enigmatic illustration conjured forth a surprisingly scant amount of information
when utilising it as the focus of a Google Image-based internet search. However,
I am nothing if not persistent (i.e. stubborn!), so eventually I unearthed
sufficient details to flesh out its hitherto-opaque history. The drawing originated
in a scrapbook-like album filled with all manner of artwork, which was seemingly
compiled by some of Jauch's friends as a birthday present for him and presented
to him during the early 1750s (precise year not known), i.e. not long before his
death.
Containing over 150 exquisite drawings and other
art, variously executed in pen-ink, sepia-ink, crayon, pencil, watercolour, and
gouache, this unique and very beautiful leather-covered album can be viewed
directly online at the website of the National Digital Library of Poland (Biblioteki Cyfrowej Polona),
and the humanoid moth (aka Locust of Kalisz) with its accompanying handwritten bilingual caption can
be found on p. 95 (click here
to view this page and to access the entire album). The album's diverse artwork includes various architectural designs, sketches and graphics, scenes from mythology, antique sculpture studies, natural history illustrations, and portraits.
Page 95 from Jauch's album, showing
the 'humanoid moth' (aka Locust of Kalisz) drawing in situ (public domain)
I also discovered a concise, excellent online article in
Polish concerning this drawing (click here), in relation
to which Google Translate once again came to my rescue by yielding a workable
English version. Dated 11 March 2014, the article was written by Łukasz
Kozak, an expert in relation to medieval times and editor at the National
Digital Library of Poland, and had been posted on the latter's website. In it,
he confirmed that the insect was indeed intended to be a deathshead hawk moth,
and documented what I too have written about elsewhere regarding this species'
unusual squeaking ability. However, he also provided some very welcome
additional information concerning the background history of this intriguing case,
including the following details.
As noted earlier, the album is filled with many images, which include numerous
full-colour illustrations of plants and animals (such as rodents, birds, reptiles, and
insects) that are generally portrayed in a very accurate, naturalistic manner. The
artist responsible for these latter illustrations is believed to have been Fraulein de Naumann, as Łukasz had revealed during his own investigation of
the moth drawing. She was probably the daughter of architect Johann Christoph
von Naumann, who in turn was not only Jauch's predecessor at the architect office
where he had worked but also his brother-in-law. Łukasz then went on to reveal
the deathshead hawk moth as the species upon which the drawing had been based,
and gave some interesting examples from fact and fiction previously unknown to
me regarding how the eerie nature of its squeaking had terrified persons in the
past who were unfamiliar with this osensibly unnatural ability, thus filling
them with superstitious dread.
Łukasz also appears in a short online
video in which he looks through Jauch's album, displays the moth drawing, and then
discusses it. This video is embedded in an article written by him and first posted
on the Newsweek Polska website on 11 February 2015, but unfortunately as
he speaks only in Polish I was initially unable to obtain any information
from it (click here
to access the article and view the video). Happily, however, Katarzyna Bylok, the Polish girlfriend of fellow Fortean/mystery beast investigator Matt Cook, kindly viewed it for me earlier this evening, and the details concerning it that she passed onto me afterwards via Matt confirm that Łukasz was merely reiterating the details that he had previously presented in his March 2014 article. Many thanks indeed to Katarzyna and Matt for kindly assisting me regarding this.
Still of Łukasz Kozak from Newsweek Polska video (© Łukasz
Kozak/Newsweek Polska – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial
Fair Use basis for educational purposes only)
However, there are certain key issues related to this memorable drawing
that remain unresolved - or do they?
Notable among these is why Fraulein de Naumann prepared such a surreal,
unrealistic image anyway, bearing in mind that all of her other illustrations
in the album were so life-like. Might it have been a humorous caricature of
Jauch himself?
The following painting of Jauch was prepared in c.1720, and he is not
portrayed in it with a moustache of any kind, but perhaps he grew and
maintained one in later years?
Alternatively, could
it have even been a comical representation of
her own father, as she would have known that he and Jauch had worked in the
same office? Or perhaps it was not based upon a real person at all, but was just
a light-hearted doodle created in jest to add some merriment to the album, bearing
in mind that it had been created specifically as a birthday present for him?
Yet another theory that has been suggested by some writers online, including biologist Prof. Stanislaw Czachorowski in an article of 9 February 2014 dealing with the deathshead hawk moth (click here), and which would certainly explain why it differed so dramatically from the other wildlife illustrations, is also worth considering. Namely, that this drawing was in fact produced by Jauch himself, and was based not upon any sightings of his own but only upon secondhand descriptions or lurid folkloric accounts of the deathshead hawk moth (another reason for its stark inaccuracy), which he interpolated in a blank space on p. 95 of his album alongside the realistic illustrations of Fraulein de Naumann.
Yet another theory that has been suggested by some writers online, including biologist Prof. Stanislaw Czachorowski in an article of 9 February 2014 dealing with the deathshead hawk moth (click here), and which would certainly explain why it differed so dramatically from the other wildlife illustrations, is also worth considering. Namely, that this drawing was in fact produced by Jauch himself, and was based not upon any sightings of his own but only upon secondhand descriptions or lurid folkloric accounts of the deathshead hawk moth (another reason for its stark inaccuracy), which he interpolated in a blank space on p. 95 of his album alongside the realistic illustrations of Fraulein de Naumann.
As for this drawing's comparably mystifying caption, what are the 'squirrel
teeth' referred to in it when describing the moth, and what is the yellow foam
seemingly regurgitated by the moth? The caterpillar of the deathshead hawk moth
has sizeable mandibles that it will click together and even use to bite aggressors,
so these could conceivably be likened to squirrel teeth; but the adult moth
only has a slender nectar-imbibing proboscis. Might the phrase instead be a somewhat peculiar allusion to the moth's antennae? In fact, having viewed the following excellent close-up photograph of a deathshead hawk moth's face, the answer now seems clear to me. The 'squirrel teeth' are simply the two ridged, outer edges of the moth's proboscis, which do superficially resemble curved rodent teeth.
It is well known that the caterpillars of hawk moths will regurgitate the sticky (and sometimes toxic) content of their foregut if attacked; but because the mouthparts of caterpillars are very different from those of adult moths, could the latter accomplish such behaviour? Nevertheless, I do recall reading somewhere that certain adult moths will indeed perform this activity as a defence mechanism if need be, so perhaps the deathshead hawk moth is one such species.
Then again, if the drawing itself was intended only as a joke, a spoof, not as a realistic depiction of anything that may truly have appeared near Kalisz in 1749 (and in view of the moth's grinning moustachioed face, this seems ever more likely the more I reflect upon it), maybe the caption was composed in an equally tongue-in-cheek manner and should therefore be taken no more seriously than the drawing.
Face of a deathshead hawk moth, showing its ridge-edged proboscis (© owner presently unknown to me - reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use educational basis only)
It is well known that the caterpillars of hawk moths will regurgitate the sticky (and sometimes toxic) content of their foregut if attacked; but because the mouthparts of caterpillars are very different from those of adult moths, could the latter accomplish such behaviour? Nevertheless, I do recall reading somewhere that certain adult moths will indeed perform this activity as a defence mechanism if need be, so perhaps the deathshead hawk moth is one such species.
Then again, if the drawing itself was intended only as a joke, a spoof, not as a realistic depiction of anything that may truly have appeared near Kalisz in 1749 (and in view of the moth's grinning moustachioed face, this seems ever more likely the more I reflect upon it), maybe the caption was composed in an equally tongue-in-cheek manner and should therefore be taken no more seriously than the drawing.
Equally mystifying is why the insect in the drawing
was referred to as a locust, given that it looked nothing like one and was
indisputably inspired by a deathshead hawk moth. However, the implication from
the drawing's caption is that in 1749 a sizeable number of such insects appeared near
Kalisz, and other Polish accounts concerning this incident that I have read
online support that implication. Hence it seems plausible that the term 'locust'
was being applied not literally but figuratively, an allusion to the large
numbers of this insect that had appeared near the city that year.
Even so, this is still odd, because although I have
read occasional accounts of veritable swarms of certain hawk moth species occurring
in various localities down through the ages, I haven't read anything comparable
relating specifically to the deathshead hawk moth. Having said that: in my ShukerNature
article on this species (click here), I
do refer to a singular incident in which approximately 300 specimens were attracted
to a single beehive within a short period of time. The reason for this was that
the deathshead has a great liking for honey, so much so in fact that some
researchers have even suggested that its uncanny squeaking ability may actually
be an attempt to impersonate the specific sound that a queen bee produces to
keep her workers passive, and thence allow the moth to enter the hive and
consume its honey without being attacked by the hive's worker bees. Consequently,
in exceptional circumstances large numbers of deathsheads may indeed occur. So although
I haven't been able as yet to trace any corroboration that is independent of
the moth drawing, perhaps one such occurrence took place near Kalisz, Poland, during 1749.
Clearly there is still much to uncover regarding
this fascinating case, but what I have provided here so far would already appear
to be the most detailed account of it ever presented in English. So, now that
its curious story is readily accessible to a much greater audience than before,
perhaps additional details will be forthcoming from readers, to plug the gaps
remaining in its history. Consequently, as I noted earlier here, I consider
this article and investigation of mine to be a work in progress, so I would be
extremely grateful to receive any supplementary information relating to it. And
as is always true with my researches, all such submissions will be fully
credited by me if utilised in updates to this article.
Incidentally, there is actually a Facebook page, in
Polish, devoted to the humanoid moth drawing from Jauch's album – entitled 'Szarańcza z Kalisza', it contains various relevant posts
and comments, plus a delightful animated GIF of this drawing, created by Mieszko
Saktura. Click here
to visit and Like its page (I have).
And finally: for another ShukerNature blog
article concerning an equally bizarre illustration of an alleged locust that
clearly was nothing of the kind, be sure to click here
and read all about the extraordinary locust dragon of Nicolaes de Bruyn from
1594.
The original, truly bizarre 1594 illustration
by Nicolaes de Bruyn of an apparent locust dragon (public domain)
No comments:
Post a Comment