The late Barbara Woodhouse on the
front cover of one of her books, No Bad Dogs: The Woodhouse Way (©
Barbara Woodhouse/Summit Books – reproduced here on a strictly educational,
non-commercial Fair Use basis for review purposes only)
I've said it before, but it's well worth repeating
- mystifying creatures can turn up in the most unexpected locations, and the
following example is certainly no exception.
To those of us of a certain age, the name Barbara
Woodhouse is fondly associated with the staccato cry "Walkies!",
uttered by a Joyce Grenfellesque lady of the genteel English schoolma'am
variety that, sadly, seems to have quietly expired in these much more
thrusting, belligerent modern times. She acquired national - indeed,
international - fame rather late in life, aged 70, when in 1980 her
idiosyncratic show 'Training Dogs The Woodhouse Way' was first screened on
British television and soon attained cult status, as a result of which she
became one of the most recognisable, and parodied, personalities of the '80s.
The Fontana paperback edition of Talking To Animals that I own (© Barbara Woodhouse/Fontana Books –
reproduced here on a strictly educational, non-commercial Fair Use basis for
review purposes only)
Nevertheless, there seemed to be no connection
between the redoubtable Ms Woodhouse and cryptozoology - at least, that is,
until the 1990s, when I was reading through her autobiography Talking To
Animals (1954), and, while perusing a section concerning her life as a
young woman training horses in Argentina, stumbled upon the following
fascinating, but very perplexing, paragraph:
Shortly
after the storm [she had been describing the aftermath of a very violent storm
that had hit their estate the previous evening], the foreman's little son came
rushing up to say that all his pet rabbits had gone and that in the cage
instead was a baby skunk. The mother had perished in the storm and lay dead by
the cage. How that living little skunk had got into the undamaged cage, and the
rabbits out of it, was beyond our understanding. In the mother's pouch were two
dead babies. Experts cannot account for a skunk with a pouch, and try to
persuade me that she was a 'possum. But she was no 'possum: she had the bushy
tail of a skunk and was identical with the skunk picture in Cassell's Book
of Knowledge. She did have a pouch: I examined her closely.
Woodhouse then went on to describe how she
attempted to care for the alleged baby skunk by rearing it and feeding it in a
cottonwool-lined pocket of her riding skirt, noting that it successfully fed
and survived in this makeshift pouch for a week before ultimately dying after
escaping from the pouch one night and becoming severely chilled.
Skunks, of which there are at least ten recognised species,
were traditionally classed as mustelids (members of the weasel family), but
more recently, based upon genetic studies, these infamously malodorous mammals have
been allocated a taxonomic family of their own. However, although they do
exhibit quite a diversity of morphologies, none of them has a pouch – a
taxonomically-significant anatomical feature specific to marsupials. Moreover,
only the hog-nosed skunks (genus Conepatus, constituting 4-5 species,
depending upon opinion) are native to South America, and only two of these species
are known to occur in Argentina – the Andean C. chinga in some of this
vast country's northern regions, and the Patagonian C. humboldtii throughout
much of its southern portion.
Consequently, I find myself in agreement with the
unnamed experts who claimed that Woodhouse's 'pouched skunk' was a 'possum -
or, to be accurate, an American opossum, of which many species in several
genera have been described. Having said that, the fundamental problem with this
identity is that none of the known species of American opossum bears any real degree
of similarity to a skunk.
True, the black-shouldered opossum Caluromysiops
irrupta has distinctive black shoulders, a black dorsal stripe, and dark
feet and tail that contrast markedly with the much paler fur on the rest of its
body, but it is hardly skunk-like. And the distal portion of its tail is
unfurred and rat-like, thereby bearing no resemblance to the uniformly furred
tail of a skunk.
Photograph of the black-shouldered
opossum (© owner's identity unclear to me; I found this picture on
Globalspecies.org's page for the species – it is now
reproduced here on a strictly educational, non-commercial Fair Use basis for
review purposes only)
Conversely, there is another species, Glironia
venusta, which is actually known as the bushy-tailed opossum because of its
unusually thick, densely-furred tail; however, it lacks any black-and-white fur
colouration reminiscent of a skunk's, and as with the previous species its tail's
distal portion is unfurred.
Illustration of the bushy-tailed opossum
(© owner's identity is unclear to me; I found this illustration on Wikipedia, and it is now reproduced here on a
strictly educational, non-commercial Fair Use basis for review purposes only)
Even the yapok or water opossum Chironectes
minimus, whose distinctive black and pale grey fur may conceivably invite
comparisons with skunks by observers poorly acquainted with these latter
mammals, can be readily eliminated from further consideration by virtue of its
very slender, wholly unfurred tail.
Illustration of a yapok from Dr Richard
Lydekker's volume A Hand-Book to the Marsupialia and Monotremata (1896)
(public domain)
As for the thick-tailed or lutrine opossum Lutreolina
crassicaudata (aka the little water opossum), its pelage (especially in
females) also has dark and light markings, though these are far less prominent
than those of the yapok; however, it has a thicker tail than the yapok, but
this is still far less bushy than that of a skunk. Moreover, of the species noted
here, only the yapok and the thick-tailed opossum are native to Argentina anyway.
Taxiderm specimen of a thick-tailed
opossum at Italy's Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di
Genova (public domain)
So what could Woodhouse's pouched skunk have been?
I have even considered briefly the possibility that the adult female animal found
dead was a genuine skunk that was heavily pregnant, and that the shock of the
storm had caused one of her babies to be born prematurely, with Woodhouse
mistaking this mother skunk's vagina and uterus for a pouch! However, this all
seems highly improbable, especially as Woodhouse was someone with considerable
experience from a very early age at caring for and handling animals.
I would have dearly loved the opportunity to
contact Barbara Woodhouse in order to elicit more details concerning her
baffling little beastie, but, sadly, she died in 1988, well before I discovered
her account of it in her book. There is still one way, however, of shedding,
perhaps, just a little more light on this mystery.
Does anyone out there have a copy of Cassell's
Book of Knowledge, which I am assuming must date from around the 1920s or 1930s,
bearing in mind that Barbara Woodhouse was born in 1910 and lived in Argentina for more than three years during her 20s? If so,
I'd love to see its picture of a skunk, because this would give some idea of
what her supposed pouched variety looked like (bearing in mind that there are
several very different skunk morphologies, depending upon the species in
question). That in turn may provide clues as to its real identity – unless, of
course, by any remote chance it really was a pouched skunk, and thereby constituted
a still-undescribed and dramatically different species?
And don't forget to check out my next ShukerNature blog post, here, to read about a very different but equally memorable skunk-affiliated anomaly.
And don't forget to check out my next ShukerNature blog post, here, to read about a very different but equally memorable skunk-affiliated anomaly.
This ShukerNature blog article is excerpted from my
book Karl Shuker's Alien Zoo: From the Pages of Fortean Times.
I find it hard to imagine Barbara Woodhouse not knowing what a skunk looked like or mis-identifying a pouch.
ReplyDeleteMy family had a collection, can't remember how many volumes, of the Cassells Book of Knowledge when i was a child. They were very old and i've no idea what happened to them but i remember i used to love looking through them at an early age, at what i considered wonderful illustrations. I will ask around (i also live next door to a 2nd hand bookshop) and see if i can find a copy.
I find it hard to imagine this too, which is why her report so intrigues me. If you do find a copy of the Cassell book, that would be excellent!
DeleteIt says the skunk was dead, but not what condition it was in. Ever since I read this a few days ago, I've been turning it over in my mind. I wonder if it's possible that the carcass was storm damaged in some way, or had been injured, so that what Woodhouse took to be a "pouch" was really an injury that sliced into the womb and exposed the almost-full-term babies? If such an injury occurred during a storm, the blood would've been washed away, and I suppose it might have looked like an organic structure instead of an injury, especially to young Irish horse trainer in Argentina. Plausible?
ReplyDeleteHi Alex, Yes indeed, it's certainly plausible. If only I'd known about this incident while Barbara Woodhouse was still alive - I'd have definitely written to her concerning it, and who knows how much additional, vital information might have been forthcoming if she had responded to my enquiry.
Delete