On 14 July 2020, I finally got around to watching Wolfen, directed by Michael Wadleigh and filmed on location in the South Bronx area of New York City. It is the 1981 movie version of The Wolfen, which is bestselling Communion author Whitley Strieber's fascinating, classic novel from 1978 about a cryptic – and cryptid – species of super-intelligent canid that through convergent evolution has attained a humanoid level of sentience and even certain morphological attributes, such as very dexterous hand-like paws.
Yet it has remained largely unknown to Homo sapiens, except for supposed legends of werewolves and cynocephali that in reality are based upon fleeting and generally fatal (for humans) encounters with wolfen, for whom lost, abandoned, and ill humans are their natural prey. And then, fate steps in, and suddenly a series of grisly human killings in modern-day NYC leads the police to the sensational discovery of this hitherto hidden species of dogman.
The Wolfen is definitely one of my all-time favourite cryptozoology-themed novels, but sadly the movie was for me a distinct disappointment. To begin with, Albert Finney played an increasingly tiresome NYPD cop named Captain Dewey Wilson who was meant to be the dysfunctional anti-social genius character that crops up so regularly in sci-fi movies. Sometimes these work well, other times they are simply irritating – Wilson was definitely drawn from the latter category.
Also, whereas in the novel the wolfen were categorically cryptozoological – as I noted earlier, even their paws were humanoid – in the movie they are portrayed entirely as morphologically normal wolves, super-intelligent but outwardly indistinguishable from typical black-furred or (in one instance) white-furred wolves, which for me was a major let-down. Conversely, their cunning ability in the movie to lure curious humans within range by imitating a baby crying is conspicuous only by its absence in the novel. There was also a recurrent red herring theme related to shape-shifting and recalling the skinwalkers, which again did not appear in the novel but perhaps featured in the movie in order to distract viewers from the distinct lack of morphological separation here between wolf and wolfen.
A modern CGI-driven remake may well succeed where in my opinion this present almost 40-year-old film has failed in doing justice to the highly original, thought-provoking subject of Strieber's novel. Don't get me wrong, Wolfen is by no means a bad movie, it's just not the movie that I was hoping – expecting – it to be. But everyone has their own opinion – so click here to check out the original theatrical trailer for Wolfen, and make up your own mind.
Also, click here and here to read more on ShukerNature concernng werewolves, wulvers, cynocephali, and other dogmen in traditional legends and lore from around the world.
The novel is on my 'to read pile' that is currently about as high as Everest.
ReplyDeleteTo be fair, if I remember right, the trick of mimicking a child's cry to attract humans is used by the Wolfen in the novel at least once, in chapter 3. Whether this is effective is left kind of ambiguous: the female cop is fooled, but the male cop isn't. He claims it sounded nothing like a real child.
ReplyDeleteI haven't watched the film, so, I wouldn't be able to compare how this is portrayed there. From what you say, it does seem like the film doesn't do the novel justice. I agree that a remake that showcases the Wolfen in all their cryptozoological creepiness would be awesome. Let's hope this happens someday, as you say, the book is truly amazing!
Yes indeed. And in the book, the wolfen's child-mimicking cry is more a case merely of the woman thinking that its cry sounded like a child's rather than truly sounding like it, as evinced by the man's dismissive attitude. In the movie, conversely, both persons are fooled, and the cry as heard by viewers does indeed sound like a child's.
DeleteAfter reading the novel I couldn't wait for the film. Unfortunately it's a steaming pile of excrement. The only thing the film and book have in common is the title.
ReplyDeleteI thought the movie was great. Granted, real wolves were used but that was part of the appeal to me. The stakes were much higher than in the book.
ReplyDeleteThe book was fantastic
ReplyDeleteAnd seemingly Plausible
It's all the dog man and feast of Bray road settings. It makes you think
The book was super. With the beast of Bray road and dogman sightings continuing and spreading to all of our states. It makes me wonder where the author got some of his ideas. I think we are looking at a very
ReplyDeleteintelligent being that doesn't change form.
The movie is excellent - it’s well acted and well produced, and I watch it a couple times a year. The wolf photography is beautiful, and I think that may be some people’s issue is that in 1981 using real wolves as the Wolfen was really the best option. That being said, the Wolfen are essentially wolves, although this breed has evolved a few distinguishing features, such as the length of their pads.
ReplyDelete