Something
has crept, or has been driven out of dark waters under the mountains...Far, far
below the deepest delvings of the Dwarves, the world is gnawed by nameless
things.
J.R.R. Tolkien - The Lord of the Rings
Could the Bodalog Beast have been a
large snake species living in Britain and readily able to swim, such as
the grass snake, as depicted here in a beautiful illustration by
Heinrich Harder from 1912? (public domain)
Thirty years ago, one of the strangest, eeriest
cryptozoological cases ever reported from the British Isles was making headlines nationally and even
internationally, and three decades later it has still never been satisfactorily
resolved. So here is my contribution to its very intriguing history, by way of
an article of mine that was subsequently converted into a chapter within my
book From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings
(1997) and serves now in updated form as a fitting ShukerNature retrospective
to, and reminder of, this macabre yet nowadays all-but-forgotten saga.
To describe one of Britain's most bizarre mystery beasts as a water vampire
may not be as melodramatic as one would first suppose - especially after
considering its unique characteristics. According to media reports, during September
to December 1988 its home was seemingly a lengthy river, the River Wye, situated
close to the town of Rhayader in mid-Wales, from which it apparently emerged at
night to kill sheep on a nearby 2000-acre farm called Bodalog, owned by the
Pugh family. Unlike those of foxes and dogs, however, its victims' carcasses
were not ripped or torn in any way. Instead, the only sign of their mystifying
marauder's attack was a small but deep, penetrating bite just below the neck,
close to the sternum or breast-bone (and which duly earned it the memorable monicker
of water vampire in some media accounts). No evidence of the creature feeding
upon the carcasses was found either, thus making its predatory behaviour even
more weird and difficult to understand.
Nevertheless, by the middle of October 1988 this
mysterious beast had killed at least 35 sheep. Its scent had been trailed back
and forth to the river by foxhounds, but it was never seen or identified, and
no recognisable pawprints were found either. As noted by London's Daily Mail newspaper on 10 October 1988, many suggestions regarding its possible identity
had been offered, ranging from otter and dog, to mink and even to some form of
snake. University scientists had examined the carcasses and admitted to being
thoroughly perplexed.
Their bewilderment is not surprising, as the
Bodalog beast clearly poses some singular problems, with none of the more
conservative explanations satisfying the facts available.
Could it have been a native European otter (above)
or a naturalised American mink (below) (public domain / © Cephas/Wikipedia CC BY-SA 3.0 licence)
Its aquatic habitat immediately rules out a fox,
cat (even an escapee big cat), or stray dog as the culprit - as well as a human
hunter using a crossbow, which had also been suggested by some authorities. European otters Lutra lutra are relatively large creatures, but are certainly not sheep killers.
They are known to take small mammals in their diet from time to time, but
nothing approaching the size of a sheep. In any event, their principal sources
of food are fishes and aquatic crustaceans - and, needless to say, they do eat prey killed by them and they do leave
tell-tale spoor behind.
Mink, although much smaller than otters, are far
more bloodthirsty by nature. Not native to the British Isles, they now exist in a naturalised state in many
parts of the country - descendants of fur-farm escapees belonging to the American
species, Neovison vison. Mink have wide tastes, ranging from fishes to
birds as large as moorhens, and mammals as large as young rabbits (reports even
exist of mink having killed pet cats and dogs!). Nevertheless, sheep would
surely be far too large for any mink to tackle successfully.
One suggestion, from an unnamed 'expert', was that
some form of giant mink was responsible! Mink, however, do not normally attain
a total length greater than about 26 inches in the wild, and there is no evidence whatsoever
that mink of a size commensurate for sheep killing have ever existed in Britain.
A little-known species called the sea mink N.
macrodon once inhabited the coastal waters of New England and the Canadian maritime provinces, and was indeed somewhat larger than other mink species,
but it became extinct in the early 1880s, and is totally unknown either in
living or in fossil form in the Old World.
Britain only has three native species of snake. [NB - herpetological researchers revealed in 2017 that there were actually two
taxonomically distinct species of grass snake living here, not just one, but only one of them is native, namely Natrix helvetica; unfortunately, various media reports confusingly and erroneously claimed at the time that both of them were native and that there were therefore four native snake species existing here.] The sole venomous species is the European viper or
adder Vipera berus, which is predominantly ground-living, diurnal, and
feeds on nothing larger than lizards and small mammals.
Relatively more aquatic by nature are the
non-venomous and diurnal eastern grass snake Natrix natrix (represented in Britain via various small, introduced, non-native populations) and
its close relative the western or barred grass snake N. helvetica, the new name for Britain's native grass snake species. The preferred
prey species of these two species are amphibians and fishes, though nestling
birds and small mammals are also occasionally taken.
In addition, Britain has a small number of the smooth snake Coronella
austriaca, again native but confined to southern England. This is another non-venomous, diurnal species
whose diet consists mainly of lizards and small mammals.
Also worthy of note is the aesculapian snake Zamenis
longissimus, which is a mainland European species that has established a couple
of small but seemingly thriving naturalised population in Great Britain – one in
central London, England, and the other in Colwyn Bay, Wales. Both populations originally
arose from escapee/released specimens surviving and mating in the wild in these
locations. So might the Beast of Bodalog have been an aesculapian snake, derived
from the Welsh contingent? At up to 7 ft long, this species is certainly lengthier than any
of Britain's native species, but just like all of them it is
diurnal, and it is not venomous. Clearly, therefore, none of these five species
constitutes a very convincing candidate for the Welsh sheep killer.
It has never been formally ascertained whether the
Pughs' sheep were actually poisoned by their attacker, but if tests were to
reveal that this did occur, then it is possible that a non-native and evidently
sizeable, aquatic venomous snake was on the loose at that time. It could have been
a pet that either escaped or, for some reason, was released, as in the above-noted
London and Welsh instances featuring the aesculapian
snake. Yet if this were true, then it could have potentially posed a very real,
severe dilemma - for there are few animals on Earth as elusive as snakes,
especially those species that are adept at travelling not only across the land
but also through the water.
Perhaps, then, it is not too surprising that the
sinister 'water vampire' of Wales was never seen, let alone tracked down. Its
killing spree abruptly ended in early December 1988, and nothing like it has
ever been reported since from Bodalog (or anywhere else, for that matter, at
least as far as I am aware), so presumably it simply died (see below) - always assuming,
of course, that it didn't move elsewhere. Yet if it had indeed been some form
of very large, powerful snake, why did it kill so many sheep but never make any
attempt to feed upon their carcasses afterwards?
Moreover, how could such a creature have survived
for at least two months in the distinctly chilly climate present in mid-Wales during
late autumn/early winter? After all, snakes are poikilothermic (cold-blooded)
and therefore rely upon warm external, environmental temperatures to maintain
their own body heat. Like all others associated with this decidedly strange
saga, these questions are likely to remain unanswered indefinitely.
This ShukerNature blog article is excerpted and
expanded from my book From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings.
Interesting article, thank you. Tis a mystery; tracking something to a river does not mean that the culprit(s) is/are aquatic or even a wild animal. The river connection may even be a ploy.
ReplyDeleteOf course, but overall it makes far more sense, and is most parsimonious, to assume that the creature was aquatic, explaining how it was able to appear and disappear so readily, and leave no tracks.
DeleteCan't help but have to think about a Dhobar-Chu. Fits for all the reasons of an otter and it would/should be large enough to take a sheep. The fact that whatever it was did not eat the sheep is strange. Maybe some misguided territorial behavior?
ReplyDelete