Dr KARL SHUKER

Zoologist, media consultant, and science writer, Dr Karl Shuker is also one of the best known cryptozoologists in the world. He is the author of such seminal works as Mystery Cats of the World (1989), The Lost Ark: New and Rediscovered Animals of the 20th Century (1993; greatly expanded in 2012 as The Encyclopaedia of New and Rediscovered Animals), Dragons: A Natural History (1995), In Search of Prehistoric Survivors (1995), The Unexplained (1996), From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings (1997), Mysteries of Planet Earth (1999), The Hidden Powers of Animals (2001), The Beasts That Hide From Man (2003), Extraordinary Animals Revisited (2007), Dr Shuker's Casebook (2008), Karl Shuker's Alien Zoo: From the Pages of Fortean Times (2010), Cats of Magic, Mythology, and Mystery (2012), Mirabilis: A Carnival of Cryptozoology and Unnatural History (2013), Dragons in Zoology, Cryptozoology, and Culture (2013), The Menagerie of Marvels (2014), A Manifestation of Monsters (2015), Here's Nessie! (2016), and what is widely considered to be his cryptozoological magnum opus, Still In Search Of Prehistoric Survivors (2016) - plus, very excitingly, his four long-awaited, much-requested ShukerNature blog books (2019-2024).

Dr Karl Shuker's Official Website - http://www.karlshuker.com/index.htm

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my ShukerNature blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my published books (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Eclectarium blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Starsteeds blog's poetry and other lyrical writings (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my RebelBikerDude's AI Biker Art blog's thematic text & picture galleries (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

Search This Blog


PLEASE COME IN, I'VE BEEN EXPECTING YOU...

PLEASE COME IN, I'VE BEEN EXPECTING YOU...
WELCOME TO SHUKERNATURE - ENJOY YOUR VISIT - BEWARE OF THE RAPTOR!


Showing posts with label mystery ungulates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mystery ungulates. Show all posts

Saturday, 12 July 2025

SPOTTING A SPOTTED BUSHBUCK IN LIBERIA

 
A typically-patterned male northern bushbuck in Senegal (© Lucy Keith-Diagne/Wikipedia – CC BY 4.0 licence)

Bushbucks are the smallest members of the spiral-horned African antelope group, which also include the kudus, nyalas, sitatunga, elands, and bongo. Traditionally, just a single bushbuck species has been recognized, Tragelaphus scriptus, albeit with numerous subspecies (some of which long ago were briefly deemed by certain 'splitter' mammalogists to be species in their own right before being 'lumped' into T. scriptus), distributed through much of sub-Saharan Africa. More recently however, it has been split taxonomically into two – the northern bushbuck, native to western and northern/central Africa, which retains the binomial name T. scriptus; and the Cape bushbuck T. sylvaticus, native to southern and eastern Africa.

Moreover, in the Cape bushbuck both sexes are generally brown, often with only limited coat patterning on the torso, even in the more showy male (though more strikingly patterned individuals do sometimes occur). Conversely, the northern bushbuck is the more familiar form, patterned as its torso is (most especially in the adult male) with a diverse, eyecatching arrangement of vertical white stripes on its flanks and often also a horizontal lower flank stripe lying beneath them plus a couple of horizontal shoulder stripes, all of them again white, as well as a series of white spots on its haunches. The overall effect is as if this antelope is wearing a harness, which is why a popular longstanding alternative name for the bushbuck as a whole has always been the harnessed antelope, but which is nowadays applied specifically to the northern species.

 
Adult female northern bushbucvk with calf in Ghana (© Lalambala/Wikipedia – CC BY-SA 4.0 licence)

However, as will now be revealed, there is one northern bushbuck specimen on record whose coat patterning is dramatically different from that of any other bushbuck of any kind – so much so, in fact, that veteran cryptozoologist Dr Bernard Heuvelmans deemed it worthy of being investigated as potentially representing an entirely discrete but currently undescribed species in its own right. In addition, its extraordinary skin is apparently still preserved in a museum. Yet this unique, fascinating individual and its very intriguing history have never been fully documented in any English-language publication – until now, that is, via this worldwide ShukerNature exclusive. So, let's begin at the beginning of this very belated bushbuck revelation.

I first learned of this singular specimen during the mid-1980s, when browsing through Heuvelmans's lengthy but thoroughly engrossing paper 'Annotated Checklist of Apparently Unknown Animals With Which Cryptozoology is Concerned', a paper that I have since returned to countless times during my own researches. It was published in Vol. 5 of Cryptozoology, the official scientific journal of the now-defunct International Society of Cryptozoology, and in it Heuvelmans briefly documented dozens of cryptids, many of which were very obscure and hitherto-unknown to me, arranged geographically and via habitat, with each cryptid's entry supplemented by one or more source references. Here is Heuvelmans's entry for the mystery bushbuck:

A small, entirely spotted bushbuck antelope, known only from an incomplete skin (preserved in the Zoological Museum of Berlin University) from Liberia (Pathé 1940).

The reference cited by him is: Pathé, Moritz (1940). Die Suche nach dem Fabeltier [The Search For The Mythical Creature]. Deutscher Verlag (Berlin).

 
The front of the dustjacket for Pathé's above-cited book, illustrated with one of his own paintings – note the spotted bushbuck skin sticking partly out of one of his cases (public domain)

Moritz Pathé (1893-1956) was a prolific and very talented German artist and book illustrator, specializing in animal pictures, and the author of several works, documenting his travels in Africa seeking rare creatures to portray, but also to hunt and trap.

Yet despite searching for more information concerning Pathé's enigmatic antelope, I was unable to locate any, and eventually it slipped from my mind. A few weeks ago, however, my interest in it was revived when palaeontologist and fellow cryptozoological writer Dr Darren Naish contacted me to enquire whether I had any information on file regarding it. As I still hadn't, Darren's query inspired me to launch another search, and this time, finally, I achieved success, thanks to two longstanding friends who both share my enthusiasm for all matters of a cryptozoological kind.

The first of these was French crypto-scholar Michel Raynal, who kindly supplied me with a copy of the principal chapter from Pathé's book in which he documented the Liberian spotted bushback (the entire book featured it, as it was the mythical animal referred to in the title, but this particular chapter contained the most significant information concerning it). Although the text was in German, I would normally have experienced no problems with translating it, but as various of you may know, for quite some time now I have been afflicted with a close-up vision problem (happily, my distance vision is unaffected) that makes reading and on-screen research difficult at present (an operation to correct this condition should be taking place soon). Consequently, translating many pages of German into English is presently beyond my capabilities.

Moreover, because the font employed in the book is a very ornate one that was commonly used in German publications back in the days when Pathé's book was published, blocking and pasting the text in sections into Google Translate and other translation sites also failed, because its ornate font rendered the text unreadable by the online translators.

But then one of my German crypto-friends, Markus Hemmler, came to my rescue, generously providing me with an immensely useful English translation of the relevant chapter (annotated by him with some very informative explanatory notes), plus other excerpts, as well as a copy of a colour plate from it (as did Michel) that contained Pathé's own very detailed illustrations of the skin, showing it dorsally and laterally, and which I've included here, as you'll see below. Markus subsequently also supplied me with an image of the full-colour illustrated dustjacket of Pathé's book (shown above here), the illustration being one of the author's own paintings, plus some of his line-drawings that appeared inside the book. All of these will be revealed later here.

First of all, however, here is a summary of the pertinent information regarding the spotted bushbuck as provided by Pathé in the principal chapter of his book devoted to it plus some references to it that appeared in subsequent chapters:

In 1937, Pathé was spending time in the West African country of Liberia, with the express purpose of hunting, drawing, and painting various of its more exotic animal species, in particular the pygmy hippopotamus and the crowned eagle. But a fortuitous meeting with a youth offering for sale a truly extraordinary albeit incomplete antelope skin changed the course of his plans completely, so that much of his time there was instead spent seeking a living example of this exceptionally elusive, ostensibly mythical, yet (by virtue of the afore-mentioned physical, tangible skin) unequivocally real creature, even inspiring the title of the book that he would write about his adventures.

To quote from one of Markus's annotations to his English translation of the relevant sections from Pathé's book:

At the beginning of the book Pathé already is in Monrovia [Liberia's capital] and until page 92 he describes some adventures like the journey from Monrovia (via Mesurado River, Stockton Creek to St. Paul River, then over land to Royersville at the Po River and beyond this river into the jungle) to Bangatown at the Lofa River [in northwestern Liberia] and his experiences and exploration of the surrounding area.

And so it was that one day during his stay in Bangatown, Pathé received an unexpected visitor in the form of a native youth named Jimmy, about 20 years old and hailing from a small village far upriver in the neighbouring but still quite distant Gola region. Jimmy had been hoping to sell the skin on behalf of his uncle to some people with whom his father and uncle had done business before, but for various reasons he failed to sell it to them. However, being mindful of Pathé's reputation as a hunter, Jimmy had then brought the skin to him, in case he may wish to buy it, and as Pathé had never seen anything like it before, he swiftly did so.

 
A b/w illustration by Pathé from his book, depicting Jimmy holding the spotted bushbuck skin (public domain)

According to Jimmy, who also had never seen one like it before, the antelope had been shot by a native hunter somewhere in Gola. Jimmy stated that he did not know specifically where, but eventually revealed that the hunter had mentioned a distant spot on the Mahé River, a tributary of the afore-mentioned Lofa River..

Pathé decided to hire Jimmy as his hunting boy, offering him both pay and on-the-job training if he accepted, which the youth instantly did, promising to return in a week's time and begin his exciting new career, which again he did.

The book then digresses, pursuing other topics such as the successful search by Pathé and Jimmy for a crowned eagle that Pathé hoped to paint, but on p. 110 he returns to the anomalous antelope skin, which becomes his principal focus thereafter. Yet what was so special about it? Here is the earlier-mentioned colour plate containing three illustrations of it by Pathé:

 
Three colour paintings of the mystery spotted antelope skin, the first one being a concept image of what it may have looked like with its legs still present; all three prepared by Pathé (public domain)

As seen, the skin lacked its head and limbs, but those were not relevant in relation to what instantly set it apart from all known antelopes, which was its remarkable patterning. Although its species appeared at the very least to be akin to the bushbuck, this skin lacked the latter's characteristic white stripes and posterior white dappling. Instead, and incongruously, its back and much of its flanks were heavily patterned with black spots, which in its dorsal and upper dorso-lateral regions had coalesced and congealed so extensively that a solid mass of black pigmentation had resulted.

Could this extraordinary creature represent a hitherto-undescribed species in its own right, or was it a very distinctive, aberrant specimen of the known northern bushbuck? Pathé personally appeared far from sure, because during the course of his book his opinion oscillated back and forth constantly between these two options.

When I first saw his paintings of it, I immediately thought of two remarkable leopards that had been shot in the vicinity of Grahamstown, South Africa, during the 1880s (click here to see my documentation and pictures of them on ShukerNature; they are also chronicled in my three books on mystery cats). Dubbed melanotic at that time (but a term rarely used today), in each of these aberrant individuals the typical black-pigmented leopard rosettes had broken up on the flanks into tiny but very profuse black spots that in the upper dorso-lateral and dorsal regions had amalgamated into solid or near-solid expanses of black pigmentation, just as was exhibited by Pathé's singular bushbuck specimen.

In the case of the Grahamstown leopards (similar cases are also on record featuring other leopards, tigers, and at least one jaguar individual known to me), this abnormal patterning is nowadays referred to as pseudo-melanism, distinguishing it from true melanism.

For in the latter condition (which is responsible for all-black leopard specimens aka black panthers, and all-black individuals in many other animal species too), the pelage's black rosettes of the individual in question are unaffected but its background colour is abnormally dark, so much so in fact that it often obscures the presence of the rosettes. Conversely, as described above, in pseudo-melanism the background colour of the individual's pelage remains its usual shade but is virtually obscured dorsally and dorso-laterally by abnormal amalgamation and coalescing of the black rosettes into large expanses of solid black pigmentation plus intense black speckling elsewhere on the flanks.

 
Illustration from the 1880s depicting the dorsal view of the second melanotic Grahamstown leopard's skin, clearly revealing its remarkable pseudo-melanistic patterning, which is ostensibly reminiscent of the spotted bushbuck's patterning (public domain)

However, the fundamental problem with seeking to identify the spotted bushbuck skin as that of a pseudo-melanistic specimen is that in typical bushbuck specimens their markings are white, not black. So as bushbucks never normally possess any black markings at all, I cannot conceive how pseudo-melanism could create this specimen's unique pattern of black-pigmented spots and coalesced black spotting.

In contrast, it is possible that the skin represents an example of incomplete true melanism, whereby instead of the pelage of the individual in question being black all over, it exhibits melanism only in certain body regions, such as its back and flanks, for instance. In some cases involving very discrete, localized body regions, this is known as mozaicism, with one famous example being that of Ranger, a male lion born during the 1970s at Glasgow Zoo (then called Calder Park Zoo). His parents were of normal colouration, but he exhibited a large black region on his chest plus another one on his right foreleg (click here to see my documentation of Ranger on ShukerNature).

Whatever the precise explanation for this bushbuck skin's aberrant appearance, however, it is hardly surprising that Pathé was so interested it – but he was not the only one.

 
A sketch by Pathé of the spotted bushbuck's incomplete skin in dorsal view that appears on the cloth binding of his book's front cover (normally hidden beneath the dustjacket) (public domain)

Not long after purchasing the skin from Jimmy, Pathé received a visit from a renowned big game hunter/explorer of English-African-Indian heritage named Charles Sandiputt. He made a living from shooting rare specimens for rich Western clients and then charging them steeply for the privilege of acquiring these greatly-desired trophies, but he was currently running low both on funds and on gun cartridges, and hoped to purchase some of the latter from Pathé. While conversing, Pathé naively showed Sandiputt the spotted bushbuck skin, and although the hunter tried to disguise his excitement, it was clear to Pathé how very interested he was in it.

Sure enough, after examining the skin in detail, Sandiputt offered Pathé a sizeable sum of money for it (despite having pleaded poverty earlier), and also offered to go hunting with him in search of additional specimens. This last-mentioned offer in particular was an abrupt about-face to say the least, after just moments earlier having turned down Pathé's own suggestion for them to go hunting together, but that of course was before he'd seen the spotted bushbuck skin!

However, Pathé refused both of the hunter's offers, having realized by now that he'd made a mistake in revealing the skin's existence to Sandiputt, who departed not long afterwards without having secured from Pathé not only the skin but also any specific details regarding who had shot the animal itself and where. Some days later, however, Sandiputt surreptitiously reappeared, and was caught by Pathé questioning his native helpers on this very same subject, but having already been prompted by Pathé not to divulge any details about it to anyone, they remained tight-lipped.

To cut a lengthy story short: After Sandiputt had exited empty-handed a second time, Pathé soon sent Jimmy back to his Gola homeland to find the hunter from there who had shot the freak bushbuck, and secure his services in a search for living specimens, which Jimmy did. Pathé dubbed the hunter Bill, who then led Pathé and his hunting party to the mountainous regions upstream of the Little Mahé River in Gola. Here, with Jimmy serving as translator, Bill claimed to have not merely shot the specimen whose skin was now a closely-guarded possession of Pathé (he even took it with him on their Gola hunt, in order to ensure that it was not stolen in their absence if left unguarded back at Bangatown) but also to have seen several additional living specimens.

However, the hunt for these elusive antelopes proved unsuccessful, due in no small way to Pathé's alarming discovery that Sandiputt was also seeking these creatures in this very same vicinity and at the very same time as them, and that – in an example of devious intrigue worthy of high politics or industrial espionage – Bill was a veritable double agent. For he had already been contacted and cunningly hired in secret by Sandiputt to tire out Pathé's party so that they would quit the search and return to Bangatown, leaving behind Bill who would then lead Sandiputt in his own search, assisted by the local villages' inhabitants to whom Sandiputt had promised a big reward for a skin or information concerning where such antelopes could be found alive. Furthermore, Bill was to steal Pathé's boat too for travelling up the Mahé River, as Sandiputt didn't have access to one himself!

 
Bill with Charles Sandiputt, drawn by Pathé (public domain)

Ultimately, however, Sandiputt's dastardly ploy was all in vain, with none of his unscrupulous plans coming to fruition, because the ever-loyal Jimmy had made sure that Bill did not steal Pathé's boat, and neither party encountered any spotted bushbucks anyway (though Pathé did make a somewhat paradoxical claim that he and Bill briefly spied two such creatures together, only to directly contradict himself a little later in his book by saying that he had failed to find any – very strange). Ultimately, however, everyone returned home in apparent defeat, certainly with their respective quests for actual skins unfulfilled. But even then, the story was not quite over.

For not long after Pathé had arrived back in Bangatown with his party, his hut suffered an unexplained break-in, with no fewer than four of his locked iron cases and trunks having been forced open, yet nothing inside them had been taken. Bearing in mind that Pathé had been keeping the precious bushbuck skin locked in just such a case (he had several of them in his hut), he naturally suspected that whoever had broken in was seeking the skin but had chosen the wrong cases. Presumably, moreover, as Pathé's remaining cases (including the one that did contain the skin) had not been tampered with, the would-be burglar(s) must have come close to being disturbed, causing them to flee before having chance to force open any of the others.

Despite a thorough investigation taking place, no culprit was ever identified or apprehended, but Pathé reflected extensively upon the indisputable fact that when Sandiputt had first visited him, the hunter had witnessed him taking the skin out of one of these cases, so Sandiputt had been aware thereafter that this is where it was being kept. Moreover, Sandiputt had reappeared at Bangatown just a short time before the burglary had taken place (his excuse for doing so being that he wished to return Pathé's loaned cartridges to him), so he was known to have been in this precise location at that precise time. Coincidence?

After describing a feverish dream in which he had shot a spotted bushbuck, only to wake up and find that it had all been nothing more than a hallucination, and that it was now Christmas Day, Pathé made plans to travel back to Liberia's capital Monrovia and thence to Germany, duly arriving home in early 1938. Pathé had always planned to make his zoologically-valuable, unique spotted bushbuck skin freely available to science, so although it took him several months after returning to Germany before he actually did so, Pathé finally fulfilled his vow by donating it to the Zoological Museum at the Humboldt University of Berlin. In response, he received the following written communication from the then head of its mammal department, the eminent German zoologist Prof. Hermann Pohle (and which is translated here by Markus):

Dear Mr Pathé!

Thank you very much for sending me the fur from Monrovia. At first glance, I could see that no wild animal from which it could have come is known. A careful comparison then revealed that no domestic animal of this coloration is known either. Therefore, it is an unknown species or breed. Unfortunately, the fur is very incomplete; it is missing the head and legs. Therefore, it is unsuitable for a new description. It would therefore be of great value if you were able to travel to Liberia again and capture a complete animal, at least the fur and skull of one specimen.

Needless to say, however, Pathé did not do so, as WW2 would soon be changing the face of the world forever. Incidentally, Pohle's contemplation as to whether a domestic animal identity was tenable for the supposed spotted bushbuck pelt is intriguing, especially as there are speckled domestic goats, for example, whose torso pelts do recall that of the spotted bushbuck. Taking this line of thought further, one might even wonder if its head and limbs had been deliberately removed by its originator (Bill?) in order to disguise the fact that this is indeed all that it really was, just a domestic creature, not a wild animal at all. This certainly wouldn't be the first time that such subterfuge has happened with mysterious mammal specimens. However, Pohle seemed adamant that this was not the case here. and he was an extremely knowledgeable, experienced mammalogist, so I see no reason to disbelieve him - but recently ia much more serious issue has arisen regarding Pathé's specimen.

As is so depressingly frequent in sagas of physical, tangible cryptozoological specimens, Markus made a worrying discovery when he recently contacted the museum for information concerning the skin. Can you guess what he discovered? Yes indeed, there was no entry either for the skin itself or for the name Pathé on the museum collection's database! However, as he did learn, the collection isn't fully digitized as yet, so the skin may still turn up there, lurking meanwhile in anonymity somewhere within the museum's capacious basement, perhaps? Also, the database isn't accessible online at present anyway, after having gone offline in 2024 due to a cyber-attack, but hopefully at some stage in the future it will reappear online, enabling external researchers like Markus and myself to peruse it directly ourselves.

 
A sketch by Pathé from his book, depicting how he conceived the spotted bushbuck might have looked in life (public domain)

Also of note is that Markus succeeded in obtaining from the archives of Berlin's Natural History Museum seven pages of written correspondence between Pathé and Pohle, but there was only a single very brief reference in them to the spotted bushbuck. Namely, in a letter to Pathé dated 25 October 1946, Pohle expressed optimism that Pathé would soon resume travel back to Liberia (now that WW2 was over), and stated: "It seems to me that you must now finally find the mythical creature and bring it back, even if it is only a domestic animal", but as already noted here, that never happened, and given the unverified nature of its continuing presence in the Humboldt University Zoological Museum's collection, Pathé's spotted bushbuck skin is an even bigger enigma now than it was before!

And on that unsatisfactory, unresolved note, with its very existence, let alone its taxonomic or genetic identiy, an ongoing mystery, we must bid adieu at least for the time being to the anomalous antelope constituting the subject of this present ShukerNature article – the most comprehensive coverage of it ever published in the English language. Markus plans to prepare a German-language counterpart, which will be posted in due course in his own blog, and when it appears there I shall add a clickable link to it here.

Lastly, one of the most unexpected aspects of this entire saga is that Pathé does not appear to have actually stated anywhere in his book the precise year when his search for the spotted bushbuck took place, but due to some masterfully Sherlockian detective work by Markus, it seems safe to say that it was in 1937. This is because Markus uncovered a short newspaper report published on 28 April 1938 by the Bergische Post, in which it mentions that Pathé "has just returned from Liberia". Recalling that Pathé had specifically referred in his book to spending Christmas there, just before leaving Liberia to return home to Germany, this clearly identifies the year that he spent in Liberia as 1937.

If any additional news regarding the spotted bushbuck skin emerges, I'll include it here as an update. Meanwhile, my sincerest thanks go to Markus Hemmler and Michel Raynal for very kindly making so much relevant information available to me, thereby making my preparation of this article possible.

 
A vintage photograph of Moritz Pathé, from his book Mit Büchse und Palette im westafrikanischen Urwald (Franz Schneider Verlag: Berlin, 1944) (public domain)

 

Tuesday, 2 June 2020

GETTING AHEAD (OR TWO?) WITH VIETNAM'S VIKING DEER - THE LONG-RUNNING SAGA OF A SLOW-RUNNING MYSTERY BEAST


The mounted trophy head of a quang khem in Vietnam's Central Highlands Animal Museum (© Copyright holder unclear – the photograph appears uncredited in the 2010 Vietnamese article cited below, and also uncredited here on the It's Something Wiki site; reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/research/review purposes only)

During the 1990s, an astonishing array of new artiodactyl (even-toed) ungulate species was revealed in Vietnam and its neighbouring Asian countries of Laos and Cambodia. These included (most famously) the saola or Vu Quang ox Pseudoryx nghetinhensis, an extraordinary buffalo-like beast but sporting long slender antelope-like horns and legs; the aptly-named giant muntjac Muntiacus (originally Megamuntiacus) vuquangensis, by far the largest species of muntjac known to exist today; several smaller muntjac species, and, most controversial of all, the holy goat (aka kting voar) Pseudonovibos spiralis, a creature so elusive that it is still known only from native descriptions and a series of preserved tightly-spiraled horns, some (but NOT all) of which have been shown to be fakes, merely the deftly modified horns of domestic cattle, leading certain skeptics to speculate whether it is a real animal at all (click here for more details on ShukerNature regarding this much-disputed mammal).

An extensive account of all of these new species and their respective discoveries can be found in my book The Encyclopaedia of New and Rediscovered Animals (2012).

Also reported during that momentous decade of Indochinese ungulate unveilings was a mysterious deer known to the local Vu Quang hunters as the quang khem, and said by them to be very different indeed from all other deer native to this remote Vietnamese location. Yet unlike all of the other ungulates name-checked here, more than 20 years later this particular one remains scientifically undescribed and unnamed.

First page of an unidentified, undated Vietnamese magazine article featuring drawings illustrating the heads of the giant muntjac (left), the saola (centre), and the quang khem (right) (© Copyright holder(s) currently unknown to me – reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/research/review purposes only)

Here's what I wrote about the quang khem (aka Chinh's deer, honouring its discoverer) in my above-cited encyclopaedia:

In 1994, Vietnamese biologist Nguyen Ngoc Chinh visited Pu Mat, just north of Vu Quang, in search of Vu Quang oxen [saola]. He didn't find any, but returned instead with local reports of a strange deer known to hunters as the quang khem - 'slow-running deer'. One hunter had also given him the skull of a quang khem, which was very unusual, on account of its bizarre antlers - for these were nothing more than primitive unbranched spikes that bore a startling resemblance to the horns on a Viking's helmet!

Technically, this odd-looking deer had actually been discovered three decades earlier - but no-one had realised! Shortly after Chinh's findings, MacKinnon [saola discoverer Dr John MacKinnon] spotted some quang khem skulls in a box of bones at Hanoi's Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources - bones that had been collected as long ago as the late 1960s, but which had not previously been examined or sorted. DNA samples were sent to [zoologist Dr Peter] Arctander at Copenhagen University, who was unable to match them with the DNA of any known species. Nevertheless, the elusive Vietnamese slow-running deer has still to be scientifically described and named.

In an e-mail of 15 December 1999, Prof. Colin Groves mentioned to me that he hadn't heard anything more concerning this deer from Arctander or anyone else. He remained unsure of its likely zoological identity, being "unable to decide whether it was just sambar with undeveloped antlers (i.e. very young or very old, "going back"), or a sort of paedomorphic sambar. Certainly the evidence indicated Cervus (Rusa)". Clearly, therefore, whatever it does prove to be, the quang khem is one mystery deer that is not a muntjac.

And that was where matters concerning this most cryptic of cryptozoological deer have remained ever since (ignoring a few inaccurate mentions of it online in which it has regrettably been confused with the saola) – or so I thought, until yesterday. That was when I was contacted by British writer/journalist Fergus Blair, who shares my interest in the above-listed new ungulates – so much so that he had succeeded in uncovering (and very kindly sharing with me – thanks Fergus!) an online article documenting the quang khem that was completely new to me. Please click here to access it (although spasmodically, and for reasons entirely unknown to me, it won't always open, instead returning an automatic 404 NOT FOUND message, but fortunately I downloaded and retained on file a copy at a time when it was accessible - hence a screenshot of its quang khem section is included further down in this present ShukerNature blog article of mine). Having said that, my lack of knowledge concerning this article was due in no small part to the fact that it was written entirely in Vietnamese and had only appeared in a Vietnamese publication.

Vietnam map showing location of Central Highlands region (© Dr Blofeld/Wikipedia – CC BY-SA 3.0 licence)

Much as I wish it were otherwise, I freely confess that whatever linguistic talents I may possess do not encompass Vietnamese, so I resorted to Google Translate in the hope of obtaining at least some degree of enlightenment concerning its contents. Happily, the result was by no means as garbled as I'd feared it may be. So here, for what may be the first time in any English publication, is the basic information concerning the quang khem as contained in that Vietnamese article.

Published on 8 May 2010 by a local Vietnamese government website entitled Lâm Đồng (but no specific author details given), the article is entitled 'Phát hiện loài mang lớn và loài quang khem có ở Lâm Đồng '.

This title loosely translates as 'Detecting large deer [giant muntjac] and khem deer [quang khem] in Lâm Đồng'. Lâm Đồng is a province in Vietnam's Central Highlands region, the only Central Highland province that does not share a border with Vietnam's lower left-hand neighbour Cambodia.

Map showing location of Lâm Đồng province within Vietnam (© TUBS/Wikipedia – CC BY-SA 3.0 licence)

The quang khem was the second of the two species to be documented in the article (following an account of the giant muntjac's presence in Lâm Đồng), and here is the information concerning it as contained in the article.

The quang khem account opens with the heading ' LOÀI NAI ĐAU ĐINH', seemingly the local name in Lâm Đồng for this creature, and which loosely translates as 'painful-nail deer species'. Reiterated a little later here, 'nail' is a descriptive term originating from local hunters that refers to this deer's unbranched antlers, which the hunters liken to large nails (as in tacks used for hanging pictures on walls, etc, rather than fingernails or toenails), so presumably the 'painful' adjective suggests that these antlers' distal points are very sharp and therefore painful to touch?

Anyway, the article then states that in a survey on Pu Mat forest (Nghe An) in December 2002, a joint survey team between the Forest Inventory and Planning Institute (FIPI) [Viện điều tra quy hoạch rừng, in Vietnamese] and Nghe An Forest Protection Department collected a pair of antlers and some skull fragments from a specimen of a strange ungulate species that local hunters called the quang khem.  Realizing that this specimen had many new features, the survey team gathered its components together to study them and the specimen has been sent to a number of leading animal experts of Vietnam and abroad (none of which was named in the article) for inspection. Experts have confirmed that this is a specimen of a species that has differences from all species of the genera Cervus (such species being known in Vietnamese as Nai) and Muntiacus (such species being known in Vietnamese as Hoanh) of the deer family (Cervidae) that are known in Vietnam and around the world. This may be a new species of the deer family, but the sample collected, consisting only of a pair of antlers and a few skull fragments, is probably insufficient to confirm this.

Just in case the 2010 Vietnamese article proves inaccessible when the above link to it is clicked, here is a screenshot of its quang khem section – please click image to enlarge it for reading purposes, assuming that you can read Vietnamese (© www.lamdong.gov.vn – included here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis for educational/research/review purposes only)

Based on documents regarding the quang khem published by Nguyen Ngoc Chinh in Forestry Journal [the full reference to this paper is: Nguyen Ngoc Chinh, 'Opinions About Quang Khem, a Newly Discovered Deer', Forestry Journal, no. 6, 1993 – which I wish to track down and read if at all possible], and upon comparisons made with samples of the quang khem currently stored in the Animal Division of FIPI, we also identified this species in Lâm Đồng.

Evidence of this province's quang khem specimens is currently stored in the Central Highlands Animal Museum, including two complete heads (mounted as trophies [a colour photograph of one of these trophy heads is included in this article]), one skull and antlers, and three pairs of antlers . The first two samples were provided by Mr Nguyen Minh Tu (Bao Loc), and skull samples and pairs of antlers provided by Mr Tran Van Thuan (Da Lat).

Through investigation, it was known that strange deer were found in Di Linh, Bao Loc, Cat Tien (Lâm Đồng) and that hunters called this strange deer 'nail head'. This is because its antlers did not branch, thus resembling two big nails.

Adult male sambar Cervus (=Rusa) unicolor, exhibiting branched antlers typical of adult specimens (© Sks2610/Wikipedia – CC  BY-SA 4.0 licence)

The body weight of this deer is about 90-100 kg for adult males. Its fawn colour is similar to that of the sambar Cervus unicolor, so it is difficult to distinguish between these two deer types when they eat grass on the edge of the forest during the period when the males are without antlers. Specimens of this deer being stored at the Central Highlands Animal Museum allow a closer study of it to confirm whether it is a new species of deer and give a scientific name to it. All work is waiting for the conclusion of the animal experts.

That account was published in 2010, but a decade later the quang khem seemingly remains an enigma, in taxonomic limbo, because it has yet to receive any formal recognition either as a valid new species or as merely a freak form of the sambar.

Perhaps as Prof. Groves had suggested in his email of December 1999 to me, it may constitute a paedomorphic anomaly. That is to say, it consists of developmentally-abnormal individuals in which the simple unbranched spike-like antlers normally seen only in young deer specimens have been retained by sexually-mature adult deer, rather than having been replaced by the developed branched antlers typical of adult deer.

Juvenile male sambar sporting unbranched spike-shaped antlers (© Michael Mayer/Wikipedia – CC BY-SA 3.0 licence)

Of course, there is always the possibility – as evidenced by the existence of the above-translated Vietnamese article from 2010 but ostensibly unpublicised outside Vietnam until now – that new research and findings have indeed been published, perhaps including full details of who the unnamed experts were to whom the quang khem antlers and skull fragments collected by the survey team in December 2002, and what their considered conclusions concerning the quang khem's identity were, but not in Western publications, only in Vietnamese ones that have been overlooked in the West. Even so, had any such publications contained a formal scientific description and taxonomic name for the quang khem as a recognised new species, it seems highly unlikely that this very notable news would not have become known internationally in mammalogical circles. Groves in particular would definitely have learnt of it, as he maintained countless contacts with leading researchers globally.

Certainly, it would appear very likely that DNA samples could be extracted from the two mounted trophy heads and compared with samples from the sambar and other deer native to Vietnam and beyond to determine whether or not they did indeed differ and, if so, by a sufficient degree to warrant the quang khem being officially recognised as a valid new species. So why has this not been attempted – assuming that it hasn't?

Similarly, comparative morphometric analyses conducted upon the retained skulls could surely provide morphological clues as to just how similar or otherwise they are to those of other deer species. Yet once again, nothing appears to have been done (unless it has been, but the findings are currently concealed within Vietnamese articles not readily accessible to Western researchers?). All very mysterious – every bit as mysterious, in fact, as the quang khem itself!

Bill Rebsamen's painting of the giant muntjac, the other deer species documented in the 2010 Vietnamese article (© William M. Rebsamen)

Needless to say, an obvious way of investigating this mystery within a mystery is to contact Vietnam's FIPI and its Central Highlands Animal Museum, collectively holding these quang khem specimens – but finding current contact details has not proven easy so far. I did unearth an email contact from 2007 for FIPI, so I emailed to it an enquiry concerning FIPI's quang khem specimens and any current news concerning the latter cryptid's scientific status, only to obtain by speedy return one of the dreaded MAILER-DAEMON Failure Notices informing me that the recipient email address in question was no longer valid. Consequently, I am presently seeking a more recent FIPI contact, as well as one for the Central Highlands Animal Museum.

The situation concerning the latter museum is particularly curious, inasmuch as I have been unable to locate any confirmation of its existence! The most notable museum in the Central Highlands region would seem to be Dak Lak Museum, situated in the heart of Buon Ma Thuot City, but this establishment is not located in Lâm Đồng, and is by no means devoted entirely or even predominantly to animals. On the contrary, it displays a wide range of exhibits, from ethnic culture, archaeology, and history, as well as biodiversity, and includes films and documentaries, not just physical objects. Another possible identity for this 'missing museum' is, as suggested to me by Fergus Blair, the Tay Nguyen Biological Institute (originally Vietnam's Redemptorist monastery), situated on Tung Lam hill in Lâm Đồng. The second of its five floors serves as a biology museum. If anyone reading this article of mine has any information or suggestions concerning or for contacting FIPI and/or whichever museum the so-called Central Highlands Animal Museum is (or was – perhaps it did exist at the time of the 2010 Vietnamese article's appearance online but has since closed down?), I would greatly appreciate details.

So, to quote Sherlock Holmes, the game is afoot! If I do succeed in obtaining additional details concerning Vietnam's veritable Viking deer, I shall of course reveal all here on ShukerNature, thereby adding, I hope, a new chapter to the long-running saga of the slow-running deer. Watch this space! My sincere thanks to Fergus Blair for most kindly bringing the 2010 online Vietnamese article to my attention and sharing his associated thoughts with me.


UPDATE - 19 June 2020 - THE QUANG KHEM MYSTERY IS SOLVED!

Earlier today, Fergus Blair interviewed Dr John MacKinnon, who provided some startling, game-changing information that after 3 decades in cryptozoological limbo finally provides the mystery of the quang khem or slow-running deer with what would appear to be a conclusive resolution.

Contrary to the claims made in media reports back in the 1990s, Dr MacKinnon revealed to Fergus that the DNA tests conducted during that decade at Copenhagen University upon samples taken from the skulls that he had found in a box of bones at Hanoi's Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources DID obtain a conclusive taxonomic identification for them – they were from sambar deer. But that is not all. MacKinnon also stated that during a visit to a monastery in Bhutan some years later, he saw several mounted skulls on a wall there, and noticed one that he recognized to be from a quang khem. When he asked the monks what this skull was from, they stated that it was from a slow-running deer, but when he then informed them that he actually knew that it was from a sambar, the monks laughed with him and told him that this knowledge was a secret and that not many people realized that this was indeed what it was from! Consequently, as noted by Fergus in an email to me today, it would appear that the 'slow-running deer' is wholly folkloric, not a bona fide species in its own right at all, but merely based upon young (and possibly also upon paedomorphic adult?) sambar with spikes instead of antlers that are passed off unknowingly – or even knowingly in some cases (judging from the Bhutan monks' initial claim to MacKinnon, for instance) – as a rare, exotic, semi-mythical animal. Case closed!

Once again, my sincere thanks and congratulations to Fergus for so kindly sharing his findings with me and contributing so significantly to the long-awaited solution to this fascinating cryptozoological conundrum.

The Encyclopaedia of New and Rediscovered Animals, featuring on its front cover Bill Rebsamen's beautiful close-up painting of Vietnam's saola (foreground) in the company of the Congo's okapi (background) – two of the 20th Century's most significant and iconic cryptozoological success stories (© Dr Karl Shuker/William M. Rebsamen/Coachwhip Publications)