Volume 3 of the Journal of
Cryptozoology, front and back cover (© Journal of Cryptozoology)
The long-awaited third volume of the Journal of
Cryptozoology is currently at the printers, so it will be published and
available for purchasing very shortly now, directly from the Journal's
own website (click here) as well as from Amazon
and other online booksellers. It can also be ordered through traditional
bookstores.
Meanwhile, here is a sneak preview - its List of Contents:
List of Contents from the Journal
of Cryptozoology, Vol. 3 (© Journal of Cryptozoology)
Hope you enjoy it!
As the Journal's editor, I am now actively calling
for submissions for Vol. 4, which will be published this coming December. A
full Instructions to Contributors guide regarding the presentation style
required by the Journal for all submissions, as well as email addresses for
editor and publisher, can be found on the Journal's website.
UPDATE - 18 April 2015
Vol.3 of the Journal can now be purchased on Amazon's USA site - just click here.
UPDATE - 18 April 2015
Vol.3 of the Journal can now be purchased on Amazon's USA site - just click here.
A pair of pink-headed ducks painted by Henrik Grönvold (public domain)
Posts
Can't wait for the new volume! I loved the first two.
ReplyDeleteIt is great to hear from Ulrich Magin as his skepticism is often very clarifying. However, I do not think he is correct about the Moha Moha. As I recall, in the past he has made the witness out to be faking and that does not fit the facts. To belittle very ordinary and humble ways of describing a sighting is not right. It is very reasonable to describe an unfamiliar creature by comparison with known creatures. This does not mean it was necessarily a giant turtle. Is Magin joining in on the sexist criticism this witness has already suffered? Could it have been a beached whale?
ReplyDeleteWhen you read Ulrich's paper, you will discover that it contains new info and his opinion regarding it takes this into consideration.
DeleteI always appreciate Ulrich's work but, as I recall, in a previous paper he was attacking the credibility of Ms. Lovell. I did not find his argument credible. It is good to know that you all have taken the Lovell report as worth serious study when it is so easy for most people to dismiss it as ridiculous. In fact, that is something that amazes me about you, because you so patiently and respectfully consider even the most far out cases.
Delete