Up to 3 ft long, superficially salamander-like in basic form, but belonging to the long-extinct nectridean taxonomic order within the equally
erstwhile subclass of archaic amphibians known as lepospondyls, one of my
favourite creatures from pre-dinosaurian prehistory has always been Diplocaulus
– famous for its huge inverted V-shaped or boomerang-shaped head, as exhibited
by several species (plus a very close relative, the lesser-known but
near-identical Diploceratus burkei). The reason for its head's bizarre
shape is its skull's pair of enormous but dorsoventrally flat, lateral bony projections
known as tabular horns. These remarkable structures may have enabled its head to
serve as a hydrofoil when this amphibian was swimming, or may even have
prevented it from being swallowed by predators, by increasing its head's width
beyond the gape of any carnivorous creature alive at that time that shared its
zoogeographical distribution range.
Restoration of Diploceraspis
burkei (© Dmitry Bogdanov/Wikipedia CC BY 3.0)
Arising in North America, this extraordinary creature lived during the
Permian Period (approximately 300-250 million years ago), although only D. minimus,
currently the only known non-American representative (native to Morocco), occurred during the late Permian. Consequently,
this makes various photographs and videos of alleged living Diplocaulus specimens
that have surfaced online and elsewhere in the media during recent years
nothing if not intriguing…
DIPLOCAULUS IN A DISH (DIAD)
The first of these
reputed resurrectées is one that I shall refer to hereafter as DIAD (short for Diplocaulus
in a dish). As I documented in my book Extraordinary Animals Revisited (2007), in
September 2004 Fortean Times forwarded to me a short note from reader
Stuart Pike enquiring about a photograph that had been circulating online and
which depicted a bizarre-looking mystery beast labelled in accompanying
internet reports as a hammerhead lizard. Here is the photograph in question:
Not long afterwards, Maltese journalist Tonio Galea
independently contacted me, requesting details about this same photo (still of
unknown origin), whose creature, according to local Maltese rumour, had lately
been discovered alive on a rocky beach at Il-Maghluq, Marsascala, in the south
of the island. I subsequently received several more enquiries from other
correspondents, and so too, it transpired, did various other scientists,
including Malta University biologist Prof.
Patrick J. Schembri, who wrote about it in a letter published on 21 November 2004
in Malta's Sunday Times newspaper (click here).
In reality, however,
what this intriguing photo depicts is a gypsum/non-urethane foam-based model of
a Diplocaulus. Investigations of mine eventually revealed via a Japanese
model-making website (click here)
that this DIAD had been manufactured back in 1992 by an amateur Japanese model
maker in response to a magazine competition. I have still not succeeded in
discovering the model maker's name, but I did manage to uncover a second
photograph of the DIAD itself, which is this one:
DIPLOCAULUS ON VIDEO
YouTube contains
several videos purporting to show living specimens of Diplocaulus (with
at least two totally different specimens featured – one pink, one green), but
all of them have been filmed and uploaded by the same person – which means that
either he/she is unaccountably successful at locating living specimens of an
amphibian deemed extinct for at least 250 million years by palaeontologists;
or, all is not as it seems.
The person in
question has the YouTube username SouldierTVSP, and has loaded three separate videos
of what is claimed to be the same specimen, which can be viewed in sequence of
their filming here,
here,
and here;
plus a much shorter video montage here;
and a video of a visibly different specimen here.
The first of the
three videos allegedly showing the same specimen was filmed on 22 July 2011 (according to an on-screen caption). The
second video consisted of three separate segments, filmed respectively (according
to on-screen captions) on 26 July 2011, 1 August 2011, and 8
August 2011. No on-screen date was given for the third video, but as all
three videos were uploaded by SouldierTVSP on 8
August 2011, this third video was clearly a continuation of the second one's
ending section. Each of the three videos was accompanied by the following
interestingly worded request: "Someone,
please teach me this strange creature's true colors", beneath which for
the third video was this additional, rather more forthright statement: "Diplocaulus
Still Alive!! Paranormal Creature".
As will be seen when
viewed, these three videos show what looks like a pink toy Diplocaulus amidst
some vegetation debris floating in a current of water, seemingly a stream or
river. There is nothing in the videos that can be used as an effective up-close
scale to provide an estimate of size for the object (but unless the surrounding
debris is very substantial, it would seem to be small). The object is moving
entirely passively, drifting and buffeted by the current, with just an
occasional slight movement of its tail or head, as might be expected, for
instance, of a toy with a jointed tail and head, but no sign of any independent
animate movements. In contrast, palaeontologists believe that in life, Diplocaulus
would have probably swum by vertical undulations of its body, as its small weak
legs and relatively short tail would not have been of much locomotory
assistance. Of course, the object in the videos just might be a recently dead
animal as opposed to a living one, but to my eyes the object looks as if it has
never lived. Also, these three videos were filmed over an 18-day period, and
yet the object's appearance does not change at all (in 18 days, a dead animal,
conversely, would have shown considerable signs of decomposition, assuming that
it hadn't already been devoured by a predator).
On 16 November 2012, SouldierTVSP uploaded a very
short video montage entitled 'Diplocaulus Still Alive! Cryptid Exist [sic]'. It began with a brief clip of a still photograph depicting
someone holding a large creature to the camera, its somewhat salamander-like head
pointing forward as it looks directly into the camera. The head bears a pair of
fleshy flap-like lateral projections, but these are nowhere near as large or boomerang-shaped
as those of Diplocaulus. The rest of the creature cannot be readily
seen; indeed, based upon that photo alone, I'm not entirely convinced that the
creature is an amphibian (not even a deformed one), rather than some unusual
wide-mouthed fish. Nevertheless, an on-screen caption states in English and
Japanese that as soon as its identity as Diplocaulus is confirmed,
the full footage will be released (but as far as I'm aware, no such release has
occurred so far). The remainder of the video shows what seems to be the earlier
pink apparent toy Diplocaulus resting on some vegetation (with a live
wild duck of similar size close by, thus providing a useful size scale), then ending
with a four-second clip of what looks like this same object floating in the water
with its tail swishing from side to side, but very plausibly caused simply by
the water current moving a jointed tail on a toy.
The final
alleged Diplocaulus video by SouldierTVSP, uploaded on 11 January 2012,
has the somewhat unpromising title of 'Kinky Cryptid Sightings', and showcases
an iridescent green Diplocaulus with an enormous head moving across a
pond (located near a waterfall) at the water surface in a seemingly active
manner before its huge boomerang-shaped head becomes entangled in what looks
worryingly like an item of female undergarment floating there (which presumably
explains the title of the video!). For these reasons alone (not to mention the wide variety of anything-but-serious videos on other cryptozoological subjects that this person has also uploaded onto YouTube), I personally find
it difficult to take this video seriously. In my view, some form of
self-propelled model has been filmed here – but I would love to be proved
wrong!
OH, DIPLOCAULUS,
WHAT CAN THE MATAMATA BE?
On 10 October 2015, the following photograph was tweeted to
me by The Anomalist @anomalistnews, stating: "Is this a better diplocaulus hoax, or a previously
unknown animal?" and "Only details on this photo is it was taken in "Asia" and was posted on
Facebook".
Online photograph
tweeted to me of an unequivocally Diplocaulus-like creature – but was it
alive? (see later in this ShukerNature article for subsequently-discovered copyright
credit)
Needless to say,
it certainly looked like a Diplocaulus, no question about that, and the degree
of morphological detail visible in the photograph was extensive – but was it a
living animal, or was it either a very realistic model or a very skilfully
photo-manipulated image?
Not
surprisingly, this mystery photograph attracted considerable interest and
comments on Twitter, including this thought-provoking suggestion by Facebook
friend Paul Willison: "IMO, a photoshop of a hellbender or giant salamander and baby mata mata
turtle", who also attached some photographs of these species in support of
his opinion.
A
hellbender (© Brian Gratwicke/Wikipedia CC BY 2.0)
The hellbender Cryptobranchus
alleganiensis is North America's giant salamander,
beaten in size only by the giant salamanders of China and Japan; and the mata mata or
matamata Chelus fimbriata is a very bizarre-looking species of South
American freshwater turtle.
And there is no doubt
that the ostensible Diplocaulus in the mystery photo does embody
features from both of these species, so could that be the answer – a photographic
montage or composite created by some ingenious morphing of matamata and
hellbender images by person(s) unknown?
A matamata
(© Stahlkocher/Wikipedia CC BY-SA 3.0)
Spurred on by Paul's
suggestion, I spent some time Google-imaging matamata turtles, hellbenders, and
giant salamanders in general, in search of corresponding photos or portions of
photos, as well as Diplocaulus, in search of matching photos of models
and restorations – but nothing turned up, until…
After scrolling down to
the very bottom of the umpteenth Google-image search page using the above and
similar animal names as search words, suddenly the mystery photograph itself appeared!
It proved to be a photo
of an exceedingly life-like Diplocaulus model created by expert Japanese
model maker Goro Furuta. What's more, it was just one of several photos (all
copyrighted to Goro) of this wonderful model that were present in a
publicly-viewable album on Goro's Facebook page. This album can be viewed here,
and includes the following close-up photo of the model resting on someone's
hand and arm:
Goro has prepared many
additional, equally spectacular animal models, and as I swiftly became a
massive fan of his work after browsing pictures of them in his several albums on
Facebook depicting his work, I am delighted that he is now a Facebook friend of
mine.
Incidentally, I'd like to stress here that at no point has Goro ever claimed or sought to suggest that his Diplocaulus model was anything other than a model - the online confusion as to whether or not the photograph of it currently doing the internet rounds portrayed a living Diplocaulus is due entirely to misinformed speculation by people seeing the photo (copied from Goro's FB album and circulated online by person/s unknown) but not knowing its origin and incorrectly assuming the model to be a real animal. (Having said that, I suppose it can be viewed as a backhanded compliment to Goro's model-making expertise that his Diplocaulus model is so realistic that people have assumed that it was a living creature!)
Incidentally, I'd like to stress here that at no point has Goro ever claimed or sought to suggest that his Diplocaulus model was anything other than a model - the online confusion as to whether or not the photograph of it currently doing the internet rounds portrayed a living Diplocaulus is due entirely to misinformed speculation by people seeing the photo (copied from Goro's FB album and circulated online by person/s unknown) but not knowing its origin and incorrectly assuming the model to be a real animal. (Having said that, I suppose it can be viewed as a backhanded compliment to Goro's model-making expertise that his Diplocaulus model is so realistic that people have assumed that it was a living creature!)
The mystery of the most life-like
non-living Diplocaulus reported online so far was a mystery no longer. In
a tweet of 10 October 2015 replying to the
original one by The Anomalist and to those of Paul Willison, I stated: "It's a Diplocaulus model, by Japanese model-maker
Goro Furuta: [and then I included the link to Goro's relevant Facebook album]".
Skull and
vertebrae of Diplocaulus magnicornis unearthed in Willbarger
County, Texas;
displayed at the University of Michigan's Natural History Museum (public
domain)
Sadly, however, it means that this boomerang-headed amphibian remains interred within the long-vanished Permian Period, but even back there it has offered up a startling surprise. Trace fossils have been found showing a pair of flaps or membranes linking the tips of its head's tabular horns to its body – in other words, Diplocaulus may not have been outwardly boomerang-headed as traditionally assumed, but might well instead have resembled in life the restoration depicted at the end of this ShukerNature blog article, on display at the University of Michigan's Natural History Museum.
If so, then any videos
or future photos of purported living Diplocaulus specimens that possess a
boomerang-shaped head can swiftly be discounted (always assuming, of course,
that an evolved modern-day Diplocaulus did not develop one during its
250-million-year continued evolution since the Permian?).
For now, however, all of
this is academic, because Diplocaulus is still defunct, but it remains
one of my favourite prehistoric creatures too – even if it has lost its
boomerang!
Modern
reconstruction of Diplocaulus magnicornis, exhibiting membranes
enclosing its tabular horns; displayed at the University of Michigan's Natural History
Museum (public domain)
Definitely one of the most bizarre looking amphibians that ever evolved!
ReplyDeleteGreat post.
ReplyDeleteI like how Goro Furuta's model seemed reminiscent of a mata-mata turtle. An interesting reconstruction.
Great post Karl. I'd heard of Diplocaulus before, but didn't really know that much about it. Interesting stuff!
ReplyDeleteI love the diplocaulus, it's my favourite ancient amphibian in the world and would be extremely happy to see one alive, even if it's not a hammerhead anymore. Great article Doctor.
ReplyDeleteThis explains a pic that one of my FB friends posted on my wall. It looked prehistoric and hard to believe it to be alive still. When I shared it my daughter, like I, searched and came across your article. Which, I might add, was very interesting as well as educational. Thank you for sharing your findings and info with others.
ReplyDelete