Painting
from 1924 of water civets/aquatic genets in their native habitat (public
domain/reproduced here on a strictly non-commercial Fair Use basis only)
Originally a civet,
nowadays a genet, unrecorded by science until 1913, never studied alive by
scientists, and virtually unknown even to the local native people (a rare event
indeed!), Genetta (=Osbornictis) piscivora is surely one
of the world's most mystifying mammals.
Yet it is an
exceedingly handsome, strikingly-coloured creature, with a densely-furred
chestnut head and body, a black bushy tail (constituting almost half of the
animal's total length of 3 ft), and white facial
markings. The type specimen of this secretive viverrid was obtained on 1 December 1913 in a forest stream at Niapu, in what is now the northeastern portion of the Democratic
Congo, by Drs James P. Chapin and Herbert Lang during the American Museum of Natural History's
Congo Expedition. Six years later, its species was formally described by Dr
Joel A. Allen from the museum, who named it Osbornictis piscivora, in
honour of Prof. Henry Fairfield Osborn (who was greatly interested in the Congo
Expedition), and recording its fish-eating proclivity.
Dr Joel
A. Allen (left) and Prof. Henry Fairfield Osborn
(right) (public domain)
Although its anatomy
suggests that it is most closely related to the genets, this anomalous species
was long referred to as the water civet because it exhibits several features
markedly at variance with typical genet morphology. Most obvious of these is
its vulpine colouration, totally different from the black-and-white coat
patterning of spots and bands synonymous with genets. In addition, the soles of
its paws are unfurred, its teeth are much weaker and narrower than those of
correspondingly-sized genets, its nose is somewhat smaller, its muzzle is
shorter, and its overall size rivals that of the giant genet Genetta
victoriae, the largest of the typical spotted Genetta species.
Consequently, when formally describing and naming it, Allen assigned this novel viverrid to its very own genus, Osbornictis, in which it remained for
many decades.
In 2004, however, a
team of researchers who had been conducting a molecular-based comparison of
several different viverrid genera, including Osbornictis and Genetta,
published their findings in a Zoologica Scripta paper, in which they
concluded that these two genera were sufficiently closely related for the water
civet to be housed within Genetta, as Genetta piscivora. Since
then, it has been known colloquially as the aquatic genet.
My model
of this enigmatic species (© Dr Karl Shuker)
Most books state that
the water civet (or aquatic genet) was totally unknown to the natives prior to its
scientific discovery in 1913; this is not true. Along with the holotype, Lang
and Chapin also obtained an incomplete specimen (lacking skull, tail, and feet)
from a native; and in the local Kibila and Kipakombe languages, it has its own
specific name - the esele.
Nevertheless, for the
most part it is truly as much a mystery to them as it is to science, with
virtually no information available concerning its natural history, and very few
museum specimens.
The type
locality of this species (i.e. where its type specimen was obtained), a large
forest brook at Niapu, photographed here at the height of the rainy season
(public domain)
In 1996, however, a
major new chapter was written in this species' sparse history, when veteran
wildlife film-maker Alan Root announced that he had succeeded in filming a living specimen in its native Congolese habitat, hunting for fishes by gently
tapping the water with its paws and then trailing its long white whiskers on
the surface to detect any movements. This unique footage formed part of a
special one-hour film of Congolese wildlife by Root entitled A Space in the
Heart of Africa, which was first screened on British television within the
long-running ITV Survival series in July 1996.
This ShukerNature blog
article is adapted and updated from my book The Encyclopaedia of New and Rediscovered Animals, the most
comprehensive book on this subject ever published.
An informative article yet the term "native",sounds belittling & has a lingering air of colonialism to it.
ReplyDeleteWould a little known animal in the heart of Europe exist amongst natives?
'Native' as used by me here is merely a very commonly-used adjective meaning indigenous to, or naturally occurring within, a given region. So I fail to see why it should be thought in any way belittling. People, animals, plants, etc, are either native to a given area or non-native to a given area - typical, scientific terms, nothing more.
DeleteHere's the video:
ReplyDeletehttp://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/genet_fishing
Hi there, This isn't the 1990s Root video, a copy of which I have on VHS videocassette tape, but it is a very good one that I wasn't previously aware of, so thanks very much for bringing it to my attention. Best wishes, Karl
ReplyDeletehey doc, I stayed at Root's facility on the Ituri river at Epulu for a few days in the early 90s. He indeed had an adult obsurnictis in a cage in the back.. and a baby one he kept indoors as sort of a pet. We weren't allowed to take pics of it though. Amazing experience.
ReplyDeleteWow, what an amazing experience to see two specimens of one of the world's most elusive, mysterious creatures, and up close too. What a shame that you weren't able to take photos of them, but still a once-in-a-lifetime encounter. Thanks very much for sharing it here on my blog.
DeleteRight? My pleasure and thanks for the article. It was a Wonderland... there was a potto, a flying squirrel, hyrax, pangolin, water chevrotain, and tons of terrifying snakes. I think, however, that that film was shot "on set" in his back yard as opposed to being shot in the wild. The Okapis next door and the chimpanzee island were also a treat. Anyway lots of fun. Thanks again.
ReplyDelete