In my previous
ShukerNature blog article (click here), I
drew attention to a very remarkable, and extremely sizeable, feline hybrid –
Cubanacan the litigon, the result of a successful mating between a lion and a
tigon (tiger x lioness hybrid), who was formerly exhibited at Alipore Zoo in
Kolkata, India. Now, here is another truly extraordinary episode appertaining
to big cat crossbreeding.
It began just
over a century ago - with the arrival at London Zoo in mid-April 1908 of a singularly
mysterious felid that resembled a slim, gracile lioness but was elegantly
dappled with large brown rosettes recalling those of the Himalayan snow leopard
Uncia uncia! Its owner was J.D. Hamlyn, a London-based animal dealer,
who asserted that it had been captured in the Congolese jungles and represented
a wholly new species (dubbed a Congolese spotted lion) - a statement that naturally attracted a great deal of
media publicity. It was even portrayed in a beautiful drawing prepared by
English zoological artist Frederick W. Frohawk, which opens this present
ShukerNature article.
However, London
Zoo's superintendent, cat expert Reginald I. Pocock, was sceptical of such
grandiose claims, and dismissed this feline enigma as a leopard x lion hybrid (leopon). A fortnight later, it was removed from London to Glasgow, having been purchased via auction at Aldridges on 2 May 1908 by Glasgow-based circus and menagerie owner Edward H. Bostock for the very handsome sum of 1,030 guineas. Tragically, it died just over a year later, in August 1909 - reputedly killed by a lion that broke through into its cage
from a neighbouring enclosure - and was later exhibited as a mounted taxiderm
specimen in standing pose (very closely resembling its pose in Frohawk's
drawing) at France's National
Museum of Natural History in Paris.
Even in death, however, this enigmatic felid, which had been named Uneeka - on account of its truly remarkable, virtually unique zoological identity (as I'll reveal shortly) - continued to be surrounded by controversy. For as astutely pointed out by Pocock on 2 November 1912 in a letter to The Field (and in which his scepticism concerning the above-noted 'official' claim that Uneeka had been killed by a lion was only too evident): "That this story was of a piece with the original account of the hybrid given out when it first appeared on the market [i.e. that it was an entirely new species procured in the Congo] may be inferred from the condition of the dressed skin, which had no sign of a tear or scratch upon it in London shortly after the alleged tragedy". So if Uneeka had not been killed by a lion after all, how had this contentious animal met its death? More than a century later, there is still no confirmed answer to that question.
Even in death, however, this enigmatic felid, which had been named Uneeka - on account of its truly remarkable, virtually unique zoological identity (as I'll reveal shortly) - continued to be surrounded by controversy. For as astutely pointed out by Pocock on 2 November 1912 in a letter to The Field (and in which his scepticism concerning the above-noted 'official' claim that Uneeka had been killed by a lion was only too evident): "That this story was of a piece with the original account of the hybrid given out when it first appeared on the market [i.e. that it was an entirely new species procured in the Congo] may be inferred from the condition of the dressed skin, which had no sign of a tear or scratch upon it in London shortly after the alleged tragedy". So if Uneeka had not been killed by a lion after all, how had this contentious animal met its death? More than a century later, there is still no confirmed answer to that question.
Reginald
I. Pocock, a legendary name in British zoology (Wikipedia - reproduced
here on a strictly educational, non-commercial Fair Use basis only)
Conversely, by mid-May 1908 Pocock had already uncovered the early history of this controversial cat,
and its extraordinary identity was duly exposed.
At the turn of the century, a male jaguar had mated with a leopardess at Chicago's Lincoln Park Zoo, the result of which was a litter of three jagupards (aka jaguleps), one male and two females. All three of these hybrids were later sold to a travelling menagerie, but whereas the male was killed by a lion, his two sisters grew to adulthood, and both of them mated with a lion. Remarkably, these matings were viable, yielding several cubs in or around 1904 - and it was one of these that subsequently found its way to London Zoo, deceitfully billed as a new species.
At the turn of the century, a male jaguar had mated with a leopardess at Chicago's Lincoln Park Zoo, the result of which was a litter of three jagupards (aka jaguleps), one male and two females. All three of these hybrids were later sold to a travelling menagerie, but whereas the male was killed by a lion, his two sisters grew to adulthood, and both of them mated with a lion. Remarkably, these matings were viable, yielding several cubs in or around 1904 - and it was one of these that subsequently found its way to London Zoo, deceitfully billed as a new species.
Bearing in mind
that this amazing animal was the complex product of genetic intermingling
between three different species of big cat - lion Panthera leo, leopard P. pardus, and jaguar P. onca - it is
little wonder that it seemed so exotic in appearance and engendered such
confusion. After all, it isn't every day that a lijagupard (aka lijagulep) turns up in London - or anywhere
else, for that matter!
UPDATE: 19 February 2018
Today, I posted a new ShukerNature blog article on the subject of Uneeka the lijagupard, specifically showcasing a long-forgotten photograph of her in the living state that I recently uncovered. It is the only such photograph known to me, and as far as I am aware it has never before been included in any zoological publication - click here to view this exciting picture and to read my new article about Uneeka.
UPDATE: 19 February 2018
Today, I posted a new ShukerNature blog article on the subject of Uneeka the lijagupard, specifically showcasing a long-forgotten photograph of her in the living state that I recently uncovered. It is the only such photograph known to me, and as far as I am aware it has never before been included in any zoological publication - click here to view this exciting picture and to read my new article about Uneeka.
This
ShukerNature blog article is excerpted and expanded from my book Cats of Magic, Mythology, and Mystery, which
contains detailed histories of a wide range of feline hybrids, including ligers
and tigons, litigons, liligers, and titigers, leopons and lipards, jaglions, pumapards, jagupards, and many others too.
What is your opinion on the mystery cat, the onza? Many native Mexicans insist its a jaguar and puma hybrid. But how likely are such matings to occur in the wild?
ReplyDeleteI would really like to know one of those native Mexicans, because as one of them I can tell you that Onza is one of the many names of the Cheetah, which is an African cat.
DeleteBiochemical and genetic analyses conducted upon the Rodriguez onza from 1986 revealed it to be identical to the puma in those respects, with no hint of any jaguar aspects. So if that specimen truly was an onza, I think that the onza is merely an ecomorph of the puma, i.e. a strain of puma that has evolved via natural selection certain distinctive external characteristics as a response to certain specific ecological requirements.
Delete"Reginald I. Pocock, a legendary name in British zoology"
ReplyDeleteSeeing as cat expert Reginald Pocock is the same man who named most of those Poecilotheria species that are so prized in the arachnoculture hobby*, I'm beginning to realise how legendary.
* A community that would generally frown upon the kind of rampant hybridising documented here! It seems like a very unusual - and somewhat lax - sequence of situations to lead to a (let me check the spelling...) lijagupard. Still, I can't disagree that the illustration is interesting, and it would have been a sight to behold!