19th-Century engraving of
the Malayan or Javanese stink badger, native to Java, Sumatra, and throughout Borneo (public domain)
If you have ever wondered what was the very first
cryptozoological investigation that I ever undertook, wonder no longer –
because here it is.
In my previous ShukerNature blog article (click here), I documented the little-known but
fascinating crypto-case of a still-unidentified Argentinian mammal captured
alive and even nurtured for a while by renowned British dog trainer Barbara
Woodhouse that she vehemently claimed to have been a pouched skunk – a creature
not presently known to the zoological world. However, that was not my first
encounter with a mephitic mystery beast, as will now be revealed.
During the mid-1980s, in what turned out to be my debut
within the fascinating field of cryptozoological investigation, I was able to
assist in revealing the true identity of another skunk-dubbed zoological enigma.
Namely, the alsatian-sized, tree-climbing Javan 'skunks' reported by the Antara
News Agency on 14 May 1977.
A common
hog-nosed skunk Conepatus leuconotus, at up to 3 ft long one of the
largest skunk species, from North and Central America, as illustrated by Louis
Agassiz in 1918 (public domain)
The baffling
report in question was quoted in full within the book Living Wonders:
Mysteries and Curiosities of the Animal World (1982), authored by John
Michell and Bob Rickard, which is where I encountered it, and it reads as
follows:
Giant skunks, probably survivors from prehistoric
times, have been discovered in the jungles of north central Java. The skunks
are as big as German shepherd dogs [aka Alsatians] and can climb trees. B.O.
Naing-golan of the Central Java Animal Lovers' Association said one of the
giant skunks was captured and killed by shepherds recently on the slopes of the
Ungaran mountain in Central Java. He deplored the fact that the giant skunks are not included on
the list of protected species.
Skunks, of
course, are not the size of alsatians, they do not inhabit Indonesia or anywhere
else in the Old World per se (but see the end of this blog
article for a pertinent taxonomic tail-note), and they are not typically arboreal.
Consequently, in an attempt to find out more regarding these Javan anomalies, I
penned a letter of enquiry to the ISC Newsletter – the now-defunct
International Society of Cryptozoology's quarterly newsletter – which was duly
published in its winter 1985 issue. And here it is:
My
letter as published in the ISC Newsletter (winter 1985) – please click
image to enlarge it for reading purposes
After reading it,
Gerald L. Wood, author of all three editions of The Guinness Book of Animal
Facts and Feats (1972, 1976, 1982), kindly wrote to me on 26 June 1986 and revealed that he too had been greatly
perplexed by the above-quoted news agency report after having first encountered
it. Consequently, he had fully investigated its strange claim of zoological
impossibilities – as a result of which he had successfully uncovered a
startling error of etymology as the explanation.
All
three editions of Gerald's wonderful book The Guinness Book of Animal Facts
and Feats (© Gerald L. Wood/Guinness Publishing)
Gerald had
discovered (but had not publicly revealed) that these 'skunks' were in fact
skinks – i.e. a type of lizard. Moreover, they were of very much more modest
proportions than would befit an alsatian dog!
The Solomon Islands giant (prehensile-tailed) skink Corucia
zebrata – at up to 32 in long from nose-tip to tail-tip, it
is the world's largest extant species of skink but hardly compares with an alsatian dog! (public domain)
Here is a
photocopy of Gerald's letter containing these revelatory details that he kindly
sent to me:
Gerald's
letter to me re Java's giant 'skunks', written on 26 June 1986 –
please click image to enlarge it for reading purposes
To provide an
official, published response to my enquiry, a copy of his above letter was
later published by the ISC Newsletter in its autumn 1986 issue, thus
bringing to an official close another longstanding cryptozoological conundrum.
Gerald's
letter as published in the ISC Newsletter (autumn 1986) – please click
image to enlarge it for reading purposes
Incidentally, I've never actually identified with
confidence the precise species of skink, giant or otherwise, to which the
confused Antara News Agency report was referring. So if there are any
herpetological specialists out there reading this blog article of mine who
could offer any suggestions, please do post them here, as I'd very greatly
welcome them – many thanks indeed!
As for the tail-note that I promised earlier: in
recent years, taxonomic revisions based upon comparative DNA analyses have led
to all of the New World's ten or so species of skunk being split off from the
mustelids (family Mustelidae) and rehoused in their very own distinct taxonomic
family, Mephitidae. Moreover, they are no longer of exclusively New World
distribution either, because those same DNA-based analyses revealed that the
two species of Asian stink badger (the afore-mentioned Malaysian or Javanese
and the Palawan ) are more closely related to the skunks than they are to badgers
or to any other mustelids. Hence these too are now housed within Mephitidae.
(Also, since my ISC Newsletter enquiry was published, the two stink
badger species have been reassigned to a single genus, Mydaus, by some taxonomists.)
This in turn means that if we use 'skunk' as a
general, informal collective term for all mephitids (rather than just the true,
New World contingent), there really are skunks in Java after all – but nothing
like the giant tree-climbers erroneously created by the Antara News Agency report!
An engraving from 1887 of the Palawan stink badger, native to the western Philippines (public domain)
My sincere thanks to the late Gerald L. Wood, whose
encouragement readily given to me during my fledgling years as an investigative
cryptozoologist were – and always will be – very greatly appreciated by me.
Gerald L. Wood, one of my earliest
cryptozoological/animal superlative correspondents and friends (© Gerald L.
Wood), and my much-treasured signed copy of his Guinness Book of Animal Facts
and Feats, 3rd edition (© Gerald L. Wood/Guinness Publishing/Dr Karl
Shuker)
This ShukerNature blog article is expanded and
updated from the original section contained within my book From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings: From the Pages of Fate Magazine.
Is Gerald Wood still alive? I would love to write a 4 edition with him of animal facts and feats. Would be very cool more than 30 years later a new version with new records.
ReplyDeleteSadly, no, Gerald died during the early 1990s, aged only in his early 50s, a great loss indeed to zoology, which is why I refer to him at the end of my article as "the late Gerald L. Wood". In 2007, Mark Carwardine produced an updated edition, which was published by London's Natural History Museum, and is entitled 'Natural History Museum Animal Records'.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your replay! Too bad he died so young. Good to know there is a new edition.
ReplyDeleteYou're very welcome!
DeleteDo you know where i can find that book and read it online?
ReplyDeleteAs far as I'm aware, it is still in print, so is probably not available to read online, at least not for free, but it is usually readily available in physical-copy format for just a few pounds or dollars at online auction sites such as ebay, or bookstores such as Amazon or abebooks.com, and is a larger-format book than those of Gerald, with full-colour illustrations throughout. Hence it is well worth looking out for and adding to your library.
DeleteIn the USA: https://www.ebay.com/sch/Books/267/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=natural+history+book+of+animal+records&_sop=15
DeleteIn the UK: https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/Books-Comics-Magazines/267/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=natural+history+museum+book+of+animal+records&_sop=15
Deleteand also: https://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/SearchResults?an=mark+carwardine&bi=0&bx=off&cm_sp=SearchF-_-Advtab1-_-Results&ds=30&recentlyadded=all&sortby=17&sts=t&tn=natural+history+museum+book+of+animal+records
Many thanks! I will probably buy it, is not to expensive
Delete