Painting
of the king cheetah's type specimen as imagined in life, from PZSL, 1927
(public domain)
How tragic it is that such wonderful creatures have no concept,
no awareness, of just how beautiful and magical they are.
Then again, perhaps they do - after all, they are cats...
Karl Shuker - Re king cheetahs, posted on his Facebook wall, 31 July 2010
Then again, perhaps they do - after all, they are cats...
Karl Shuker - Re king cheetahs, posted on his Facebook wall, 31 July 2010
Many mysterious
African animals once thought to be legendary or wholly imaginary monsters
solely confined to the realms of native folklore and superstition have
ultimately been found to be real (albeit elusive) creatures that have
successfully eluded formal scientific recognition until modern times. The
mountain gorilla, okapi, giant forest hog, and pygmy hippopotamus were all
dismissed as myths by Western science until the 20th Century. So too was
another bizarre beast - the leopard-hyaena or nsui-fisi...until 1926.
UNMASKING
THE NSUI-FISI
This was when a
short letter penned by Major A.C. Cooper from Salisbury (now Harare) in
Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) was published by The Field, alongside his
photograph of an extraordinary cat skin. Cooper believed the skin to be from a
crossbreed of leopard and cheetah, which had been trapped at Macheke, about 62
miles southeast of Salisbury, but he was astonished by the exceptionally ornate
markings adorning its golden-yellow coat, which were unlike those of any cat previously
recorded by science. Upon its flanks and upper limbs they consisted of graceful
curved stripes and abstract blotches, whereas a series of longitudinal stripes
ran from its neck and shoulders along the entire length of its back to the
upper portion of its tail, and a succession of thick black stripes encircled
the remainder of its tail. Also of note were its non-retractile claws (a
cheetah characteristic), and a mane-like ruff round its neck.
Back
view of a king cheetah, revealing its very eyecatching longitudinal dorsal
stripes (© Steve Jurvetson-Wikipedia-Flickr)
This wonderful
creature matched traditional tribal descriptions of a strange monster termed
the nsui-fisi (‘leopard-hyaena’), which was fervently claimed by Rhodesian
natives to be the rare, exotic progeny of liaisons between leopards and
hyaenas, as it was said by them to be as lithe, swift, and cunning as a leopard
but boldly barred like the striped hyaena Hyaena hyaena. Such an
identity was zoologically impossible, of course, but the fact remained that
Cooper's mysterious big cat was still unexplained.
Not
surprisingly, it soon attracted the attention of felid specialist Reginald
Pocock, from the British Museum (Natural History), who identified it from
Cooper's photograph as an aberrant leopard. (Interestingly, during the early
years of the 20th Century, cats just like it had apparently been
well known to locals in the Mazoe area of Rhodesia's northern region, where
they were referred to as Mazoe leopards.) Once he was able to examine the skin
itself, however, he swiftly changed his mind, recognising it to be from a
cheetah - albeit one with dramatically different coat markings from the
familiar polka-dot pelage of the normal cheetah Acinonyx jubatus. In
1927, Pocock announced that the skin represented a new species, which, due to
its regal appearance and vaguely leonine mane, he dubbed Acinonyx rex -
the king cheetah.
During the next
few years, several other king cheetah skins were obtained - all from a triangle
of terrain enclosing eastern and southern Zimbabwe, northern South Africa, and
eastern Botswana - but as the number of skins increased, it became evident that
some of these were intermediate in appearance between normal cheetahs and the
first king cheetah, documented by Major Cooper. In other words, there was no
longer a clear morphological demarcation line between spotted cheetahs and the
striped king cheetah. This could mean only one thing - the king cheetah was not
a distinct species in its own right after all. Instead, it was merely a freak
mutant variety of the normal cheetah - which Pocock conceded in 1939.
As a result,
interest in the king cheetah waned, and after a time reports of such specimens
rarely emerged. Indeed, by the 1970s some zoologists had begun to fear that
this handsome striped strain had died out, but during the 1970s a king was
filmed living with normal cheetahs in the Kruger National Park.
The
1970s Kruger-inhabiting king cheetah individual, as featured on the front cover
of leading king cheetah researcher Lena Bottriell's definitive book, King
Cheetah (1987)
Today, there is
no doubt that the king cheetah is indeed alive and well, with several specimens
having been born within litters of normal spotted cheetahs in captivity in
South Africa.
THE
GENETICS OF A KING
Since its
scientific discovery, there has been a great deal of conflict concerning the
king cheetah's taxonomic status. At first it was believed to be a hybrid of
leopard and cheetah, then a valid species, and ultimately a mutant form of the
normal cheetah. In May 1981, however, the de Wildt Cheetah Breeding and
Research Centre of Pretoria's National Zoological Gardens was able to examine
this issue in a thorough manner, when a king cheetah was unexpectedly born to a
pair of normal cheetahs here. A few days later, moreover, a second king was
born, this time to the sister of the first king's mother.
These fortuitous
events duly initiated a programme of monitored breeding conducted at the
centre, in order to determine the genetic basis of the king cheetah phenotype.
By 1986, it had become clear that a recessive mutant allele was responsible,
equivalent to the recessive allele producing the blotched tabby coat pattern in
domestic cats. In other words, only cheetahs with two copies of the 'king'
allele are kings. Cheetahs with one copy of the king allele and one of the
normal (wild-type) spotted allele, or cheetahs with two copies of the spotted
allele and none of the king allele, are normal spotted cheetahs.
Moreover, in a paper
published by the journal Science in September 2012, a team of American
genetics researchers from several different institutes revealed that they had
identified the specific gene responsible for the king cheetah's striped coat
pattern and the blotched coat pattern in domestic tabby cats. Both are caused
by a recessive mutation in a gene dubbed Taqpep by the researchers.
Close-up
of a king cheetah's fur, revealing its blotched-tabby-homologous pelage
markings (© Wegmann/Wikipedia)
And so, one
mystery concerning the king cheetah is a mystery no more - but there are others
that still await a solution, and none is more fascinating than the following
example.
UNMASKING
THE MPISIMBI?
What makes the
king cheetah so memorable in addition to its incredibly beautiful coat is its
extremely limited distribution. Many freak mutations of coat colour or
patterning in mammals are spontaneous, i.e. they can arise abruptly in any
population of a given species, regardless of geographical location. Yet whereas
the typical spotted cheetah occurs in southern, eastern, central, northern, and
western Africa, king cheetahs have never been reported conclusively outside
southern Africa – or have they?
There are two
possible and potentially extremely significant exceptions to this
widely-assumed rule (and three, if we consider some remarkable evidence that I lately
uncovered for the erstwhile presence of at least one king cheetah specimen in
the wild not anywhere in Africa, but instead in Asia, and which in 2013 I
formally documented in Vol. 2 of the Journal of Cryptozoology, whose
logo, very aptly, is a king cheetah – click here
for further details).
The first possible
exception to the king cheetah's strict zoogeographical limitation to southern
Africa is a king cheetah skin that in 1988 turned up in the West African
country of Burkina Faso. It supposedly came from a specimen that had been shot
by a poacher in the northern end of the Singou Total Fauna Reserve. Some
researchers wonder whether this mystifying skin is one that in reality originated
in southern Africa but which later travelled northwest via itinerant poachers
or other skin traders. Alternatively, however, could a 'king' strain of cheetah
have spontaneously arisen in West Africa?
As for the
second putative exception to the rule of the king cheetah being exclusively
southern African in distribution, this is one that has never been publicly
revealed – until now. It features an extremely obscure East/Central African
mystery beast known as the mpisimbi
In 1927, Chambers’s
Journal published a fascinating article on East and Central African mystery
beasts entitled ‘On the Trail of the Brontosaurus and Co.’. It was written by
‘Fulahn’, the pen-name of Captain William Hichens - a man whose name should
already be familiar to mystery cat aficionados. For he was none other than the
Native Magistrate at Lindi, Tanzania, during the 1920s and 1930s who
investigated a succession of particularly gruesome murders there attributed by
the local people to a giant brindled mystery cat known as the nunda or mngwa
(click here for a ShukerNature blog post
devoted to this feline cryptid).
Most of the
cryptids documented by Hichens in his Chambers's Journal article are
relatively famous ones, with one notable exception. Contained within his
account are a couple of tantalising lines that have fascinated and frustrated
me in equal measures for many years:
"But such are the mystery animals. There are others – the
mpisimbi, the leopard-hyaena, which eats sugar-cane, and which I have hunted
many a weary night without success;"
Despite numerous
searches, I have never been able to uncover any additional information concerning
this enigmatic creature. So what exactly is the mpisimbi?
The above-quoted
lines offer no morphological description whatsoever of the mpisimbi.
Conversely, its name’s English translation – ‘leopard-hyaena’ - is very
intriguing, because it corresponds precisely with the English translation of
the king cheetah’s native South African name, nsui-fisi. Moreover, Hichens’s
unusual claim that the mpisimbi eats sugar-cane adds further to a putative link
between the mpisimbi and the king cheetah, because in a second article,
published under his own name a year later in Wide World Magazine,
Hichens stated: “The Nsuifisi, or striped cheetah...was also reputed to be a
raider of grain and sugar-cane”.
Of course, as
Hichens went on to discuss, because cheetahs are carnivores it seems improbable
that they would raid grain-plots. And even though hyaenas are notorious
scavengers with an extremely catholic diet, they are not known to attack
standing crops, but they will certainly devour cooked grain, vegetables, and
even boiled flour.
Such
considerations and qualifications, however, are not significant with regard to
the cryptozoological mystery under review here. What is significant is
that both the mpisimbi and the nsui-fisi were claimed, rightly or wrongly, by
the native tribes in their respective, separate areas of Africa to consume the
very same unexpected foodstuff – sugar-cane.
Is it
conceivable, therefore, that the mpisimbi and the nsui-fisi are indeed one and
the same creature – namely, the king cheetah? If so, it suggests that at some
time in the distant past, striped cheetahs did exist in East and/or Central
Africa – although, with no modern-day reports of such beasts on file, even if
they once did exist there they seemingly no longer do. Put another way:
whatever it may have been, tragically the mpisimbi is now apparently extinct.
Of course,
sceptics may well claim that this is all supposition, but the presence of those
brief lines regarding the mpisimbi in Hichens’s article means that the
possibility of mpisimbi and king cheetah synonymity, however remote it may
seem, cannot be discounted.
Moreover, who
can say whether, in the future, a king cheetah or two will not spontaneously
arise in the East African population of the normal spotted cheetah? That is,
after all, what spontaneous mutations do!
At present,
however, the mystery of the mpisimbi's zoological identity remains yet another
enigma in the eventful history of Africa's extraordinary striped cheetah - the
once (and future?) king.
For plenty of fascinating
additional information concerning king cheetahs and other exotic cheetah
varieties (including woolly cheetahs, blue-spotted cheetahs, black cheetahs,
and unspotted cheetahs or cheetalines, be sure to check out my two dedicated crypto-cat
books – Mystery Cats of the World (Robert
Hale: London, 1989) and Cats of Magic, Mythology, and Mystery (CFZ Press:
Bideford, 2012).
Is there a "king tiger" also found in nature? The Germans named their most advanced tank in WW2 "King Tiger" and I've always wondered where the name came from...
ReplyDeleteThe Bengal tiger used to be called the royal tiger, so it may possibly have been derived from this; but genetically, there is no tigerine equivalent to the king cheetah (at least not as yet anyway). There are leopard and jaguar equivalents.
ReplyDeleteI can't help but notice that the 3 stripes on a king cheetah's back might be compared to tall sturdy cane stalks, while the base color is comparable to cane syrup. I wonder if some past culture or cultures made these comparisons and had beliefs connecting appearance with eating. As for the range, the Bantu language family covers both extremes; all of Tanzania and about half of South Africa, so perhaps such beliefs were common to Bantu peoples in the distant past.
ReplyDelete