Suitably named – the truly
unparalleled, peerless clifden nonpareil, gorgeously portrayed in Dr F. Nemos's
book Europas bekannteste Schmetterlinge. Beschreibung der wichtigsten Arten
und Anleitung zur Kenntnis und zum Sammeln der Schmetterlinge und Raupen (c.1895)
In a previous ShukerNature blog article (click here), I reminisced about my lifelong ambition
(finally fulfilled after 48 years of ongoing frustration!) to see the bird
above all others that had bewitched me from my earliest days – that
cerise-plumed, butterfly-winged wonder known as the hoopoe, which is a rare but
annual visitor to Great Britain.
So too is another species – one that to me is the
hoopoe of the moth world, because the thought of seeing this spectacular
creature one day fills me with just as much enthusiasm and passion as I felt
for so long and so earnestly in relation to the hoopoe. Yet whereas the latter
is finally on my list of observed species, its equally charismatic lepidopteran
counterpart remains resolutely unseen, still unencountered by me more than 54
years on from when I made my debut on the planet that I share with it.
So what is this peerless, unparalleled
species? None other than the fittingly-named clifden nonpareil Catocala
fraxini ('nonpareil' translates from the French as 'without equal'). One of
Britain's largest species of moth, it is also known, again
appropriately albeit somewhat less romantically, as the blue underwing.
Indeed, so noteworthy is this moth's appearance
that it even attracted the attention of eminent Russian novelist Vladimir
Nabokov. Well known for his passion for Lepidoptera, he immortalised the
clifden nonpareil in his novel The Gift (1938, English translation 1963):
"Your blue stripe, Catocalid, shows from under its gray lid".
This celebrated species belongs to the taxonomic
family Noctuidae, the owlet moths, which is the largest family of moths, is of
worldwide distribution, and contains over 35,000 species. Within this family is
the genus Catocala, containing over 250 species, native to Eurasia and
North America, which are popularly termed underwings or underwing moths (Catocala
is Greek for 'beautiful hind ones'). This name refers to the usually bright
stripes of colour present on the upper side of their hindwings. At rest, an
underwing moth's hindwings are concealed beneath its larger but very drab, grey-brown,
cryptically-patterned forewings, allowing it to remain hidden from predators
when resting in the open on the trunks of trees, etc. Should its presence be
detected, however, in order to startle the predator momentarily and thus
provide valuable escape time the moth will flash its brightly-coloured hindwings,
abruptly revealing their colours. Due to the semi-circular shape of the
stripes, moreover, it has been speculated that they may look like owl eyes to
smaller birds, which would therefore frighten them away, saving the moth.
These stripes occur in a wide range of colours,
varying between species, and many Catocala species are named accordingly.
Thus there are red underwings, crimson underwings, rosy underwings, scarlet underwings,
pink underwings, and so forth. Moreover, certain members of related genera that
possess comparable hindwings are also referred to as underwings, such as the
copper underwings Amphipyra spp., yellow underwings Noctua spp.,
and the brown underwing Minucia lunaris. In addition, there are two
species of orange underwing Archlearis spp., but these belong to a
separate taxonomic family, Geometridae.
A red underwing Catocala nupta
(top) and a clifden nonpareil (bottom), pictured in The Natural History of
British Moths (1836), by J. Duncan
Yet despite the difference in specific colours,
these many species' hindwing stripes all occur in the red portion of the colour
spectrum – all except the stripes of one very singular, special species, that
is. Lone among all underwings, the stripes of the clifden nonpareil are blue,
and not just some nondescript grey-blue shade either, but instead a bright,
truly spectacular blue, which must be genuinely dazzling if suddenly flashed in
the face of an inquisitive, too-close-for-comfort avian observer.
Blue has always been far and away my all-time
favourite colour – so much so in fact that I sometimes wonder whether my
wardrobe would have been so plentifully packed with Levis and other jeans, not
to mention trucker jackets and shirts, had the predominant dye for denim been
anything other than blue! Hence it was inevitable that a blue underwing – and especially
when it is the only blue underwing – would attract my enduring interest
and attention once I'd learnt of such an exotic creature's existence, and thus has
it proved.
Moreover, boasting a 4-inch wingspan the clifden
nonpareil is set apart from all other underwings not only by its blue hindwing
stripes but also by its very large size – indeed, it is the world's largest
species of Catocala underwing. It was scientifically named by none other
than Linnaeus, in 1758, who dubbed it Phalaena fraxini (noting its sometime
occurrence on ash trees, Fraxinus spp.) but it was subsequently rehoused
in the genus Catocala after the latter was coined in 1802 by German
entomologist Franz von Paula Schrank. It has a wide Old World distribution, being found as a resident in deciduous
woodlands (especially near water) of northern and central Europe (and as a migrant in eastern and southern Europe), as well as in northern Asia, and in temperate
eastern Asia as far as Japan. However, it is its famed rarity in Britain that has earned it its reputation as a
near-legendary species - one that was prized above all others by moth
collectors during the Victorian era.
The first published reference to the clifden
nonpareil's occurrence in Britain was by Benjamin Wilkes in his book The
English Moths and Butterflies (1749), in which he recorded a specimen
lately collected by a Mr Davenport on an ash tree near Clifden (now known as
Cliveden) in Buckinghamshire – the location which, together with its unrivalled
beauty, earned this species its common name. However, it had been known in Britain since at least 1740 – the year in which a specimen
now in the Dale Collection within Oxford's Hope Museum was collected in Dorset. Since then, usually single specimens have been
reported in a number of English counties spasmodically up until the 1940s and 1950s,
during which period sightings increased as its range temporarily expanded due
to favourable climatic conditions, even giving brief hope that this evanescent species
had permanently established itself as a resident in Kent and the Norfolk Broads.
Sadly, however, that hope was not fulfilled, because sightings fell again
following the return of less favourable climate by the early 1960s, and it once
more became merely an irregular immigrant.
Favouring the aspen as its larval foodplant (though
also selecting other poplar species if aspen are not present, and sometimes
found on ash trees too), the clifden nonpareil is most commonly sighted in
September, particularly in southern and southeastern England. In recent years, however, there have been well-publicised
records from the Westcountry counties too (one specimen turned up at Cornwall's Lost Gardens of Heligan in autumn 2010), and there is even a faint possibility
that small colonies are establishing themselves in Suffolk. The recolonisation of southern England by this exquisite species would be a wonderful
occurrence, so we can but hope that prevailing climatic conditions continue to encourage
this most welcome trend. And who knows – if this does occur, one day the
clifden nonpareil might expand its range even further, taking in my home county
of the West Midlands. In 1872, there was a record from the neighbouring
county of Shropshire, plus there are several 19th-Century records from northern
England, and even Scotland and Ireland too, so it was clearly not a confirmed southerner
back then.
What a marvellous, magical experience it would be if,
finally, some day in the not-too-distant future I could encounter a large grey
moth that suddenly flashed its hindwings at me to reveal a dazzling stripe of
bright blue. For me, such an event would definitely be peerless, truly
unparalleled – just like the clifden nonpareil itself.
Wilkes book of 1749 states the first Clifden nonpareil was at Clifden. However, to say the 1940 Dorset specimen precedes this can only be stated with certainty if the date of the Clifden record is know. Surely it cannot be assumed that it was recorded in the year Wilkes book was published. I presume Wilkes does not give a date.
ReplyDeleteMartin Albertini
Bucks moth recorder
Thanks for your comment, but you have entirely missed the point here. What I said was: "The first published reference to the clifden nonpareil's occurrence in Britain was by Benjamin Wilkes in his book The English Moths and Butterflies (1749)", with the emphasis on the word 'published'. I didn't say whether or not the Clifden record in it was before or after the 1740 (not 1940!) Dorset record. What I said was that the first PUBLISHED record of this species in Britain was in Wilkes's book, which is a very different matter.
DeleteI'm happy to say that events regarding the clifden nonpareil recolonising Great Britain have improved greatly since I wrote the above blog article back in 2014. In particular, the current (2020) version of the New Forest National Park's official website states that this species "is resident in parts of southern England, eastern England and the New Forest". Excellent news! https://www.newforestnpa.gov.uk/discover/wildlife/moths/clifden-nonpariel/
ReplyDelete