A
beautiful vintage (1800s) full-colour illustration of the unique isabella quagga
(public domain)
The quagga Equus quagga quagga is nowadays famous for two very different
reasons. Firstly: it is – or was – the only semi-striped form of zebra, its
striping being confined to its foreparts. Secondly: although once common in its
South African veldt habitat, it was hunted into extinction there during the
second half of the 19th Century, with the very last captive
specimen's death in Amsterdam Zoo on 12 August 1883 marking the tragic
disappearance of this highly distinctive equid from the face of our planet – though
The Quagga Project continues its aim to recreate this vanished creature's characteristic
phenotype (external appearance) via back-breeding, using striping-deplete
specimens of other Equus quagga
subspecies to produce quagga facsimiles.
Speaking of which: today, the quagga is classed
as a subspecies of the plains zebra Equus
quagga, but back in the mid-1800s when still very much alive it was deemed
to be a valid, distinct species in its own right, and was dubbed Hippotigris quacka (hippotigris being
the name given to zebras by ancient scholars who believed these exotic-looking striped
equids to be the product of matings between horses and tigers!) – see later for
further taxonomic details. But that is not all.
One
of five precious photographs of an adult quagga mare living at London Zoo from 15 March 1851 until her death there on 15 July 1872 – these are
the only known photos of a live quagga (click here for more details concerning this quagga quintet)
For a time during that same period, a
second, very remarkable quagga species was also recognized, despite being known
from just a single specimen – a poorly-preserved skin formerly held at the
British Museum in London. This unique, extraordinary-looking animal became
known as the isabella quagga, but today the skin is long lost and the isabella
quagga itself is long forgotten. Consequently, I felt that what (very) little
is known about this beautiful if baffling enigma of an equid richly deserved to
be collated and presented in article form in order for modern-day readers to
become aware of its erstwhile existence. So here is the hitherto-obscure
history of the long-overlooked isabella quagga – a ShukerNature exclusive.
I first learned of the isabella quagga Hippotigris isabellinus many years ago,
when I chanced upon the following previously-obscure yet fascinating excerpt
from a quagga-themed communication by famous British zoologist Richard Lydekker
that had been published by the scientific journal Nature on 10 January 1901. The excerpt alluded to a supposedly
separate, second species of quagga, again extinct:
...the British Museum
formerly had the skin of a young quagga, in very bad condition, which was
presented by the traveller William Burchell [after whom Burchell's zebra is named],
and was subsequently described by Hamilton Smith as a distinct species, under
the name of Hippotigris isabellinus.
Two
points to note here. Firstly: the above-mentioned Hamilton Smith was Charles
Hamilton Smith (1776–1859), a lieutenant-colonel in the British Army. He was
also a naturalist who scientifically described and named several equine species
and subspecies. In two 1841-published tomes referred to later here, he dubbed
this enigmatic animal the isabella quagga. Secondly: whereas all zebra species
and subspecies are nowadays housed in the genus Equus (alongside horses and asses), back in Lt-Col. Hamilton
Smith's time several were housed in their own separate genus, Hippotigris, including the normal
quagga, which was formally deemed back them to be a valid species in its own
right (rather than merely a subspecies of the plains sebra, as it is classified
today) and was duly known as Hippotigris
quacka.
Late 1800s chromolithograph from my personal collection, depicting a normal quagga with a bushbuck and a gnu (public domain)
Lydekker's communication then continued with the
following text, but it is unclear whether this text was still referring to the
isabella quagga or (as I suspect) had returned to the communication's primary
subject, the normal quagga:
Apparently London
museums possess no other relics of this lost species, of which, however, we
believe there is a specimen in the museum at Edinburgh. As the animal yielded
no trophies worthy the attention of the sportsman, it is unlikely that there
are any specimens in private collections, unless, perchance, a skull or two may
be in existence.
The remaining text in Lydekker's communication
unequivocally referred to the normal quagga, so it needn't be quoted here.
What exactly was the isabella quagga, I wondered,
when I first began researching this curious creature, and what did it even look
like, bearing in mind that Lydekker provided no description of it in his
communication and the British Museum no longer has it?
Back in pre-internet times, it was by no means easy
to research anything as unimaginably obscure as the isabella quagga, so after
various attemptss to solicit more information concerning it all proved futile,
I placed Lydekker's intriguing communication on file and directed my attention
to other subjects. Notwithstanding these failures, however, I never forgot
about it, so when I was checking some details recently while completing some
other researches and noticed it again, still on file, I decided to reinvestigate
its elusive subject, but now assisted enormously by the vast wealth of data
readily accessible online. And this time, finally, I was successful, as now
revealed.
Originally, my only clue had lain in its moniker.
For in this instance, isabella refers not to a woman's name but instead to a
colour, known in full as isabelline, and which constitutes this mystery
quagga's species name, isabellinus.
It is variously defined as pale grey-yellow, pale fawn, pale
cream-brown or parchment colour, and is primarily utilised in relation to
mammalian coat colour and bird plumage.
Presumably,
therefore, I mused, this shade was the background colouration of the coat of
this unique specimen (a male, incidentally), meaning, if so, that it was paler
in appearance than normal quaggas and probably with fainter stripes too.
Whether such a difference warranted Hamilton Smith naming it as a separate
species, however, when it was surely nothing more than an aberrantly pallid
(possibly leucistic?) specimen of the normal quagga (see later), was another
matter.
The pale-coloured engraving of the isabella quagga
from Hamilton Smith's two 1841 tomes (public domain)
During
my recent researches, I uncovered two beautiful vintage illustrations depicting
the isabella quagga, both of which represent it in the living state. One of
these illustrations is a hand-coloured engraving in very pale shades with minimal background
colouration. The other illustration is in full-colour, so it is much more vibrant.
I
traced the pale engraving back to a couple of tomes from 1841, which upon close
examination turned out to be identical in content but bearing different titles.
One is entitled Horses, and
constitutes Volume 20 of the massive 40-volume series edited by Sir William
Jardine and entitled The Naturalist's
Library. The other tome is exactly the same but is retitled as The Natural History of the Horse and
constitutes a stand-alone volume. In both tomes, the author is given as Charles
Hamilton Smith, and a concise section documenting what he specifically refers
to as the isabella quagga is included, containing the pale engraving of this
specimen. In both tomes, it is designated as Plate 25, and is credited to
Hamilton Smith.
In his
duplicated 1841 tomes, Hamilton Smith began his brief coverage of the isabella
quagga (pp. 332-334, and which constitutes this claimed species' formal
scientific description and naming) by stating that although this animal's body
shape (including its head) compared closely with that of the normal quagga, he
had separated it from the latter equid because it differed by virtue of its
smaller size (barely 10 hands, i.e. 40 in, tall) and even more so by the forms
and colour of its stripes.
He
then referred to an unidentified equid seen by travelling French naturalist
François Le Vaillant (1753-1824), presumably in South Africa's Cape as this is
where he had spent time collecting animal specimens, and which he'd named the
zebre but was apparently different from those zebras already known from there.
Some zoological authorities, including Dutch zoologist Coenraad Temminck (whose
father was Le Vaillant's employer) had considered the isabella quagga to be Le
Vaillant's zebre, but Hamilton Smith disagreed with their opinion.
The
remainder of Hamilton Smith's account consisted of a verbal description of the
isabella quagga skin (augmenting the engraving of this animal portrayed in the
living state), which included his belief that it was an adult rather than a
juvenile specimen despite its small size, and was not albinistic. Conversely,
when concluding his account by mentioning that a Dr Leach had believed the skin
(which still existed at the British Museum at this time) to have originally
come from the Cape, he conceded that Leach had considered its pale colouration,
especially its white stripes, to be due to the animal's 'nonage' (young age).
Moreover,
it should be noted here that back in Hamilton Smith's time, there was a
somewhat naïve but very prevalent tendency among taxonomists to over-emphasise
the significance of individual variation within species, leading to the
splitting off and naming of many spurious animal species that in reality were
nothing more than freakishly-coloured/patterned individuals of already known,
confirmed species. Eventually, however, such shortcomings were rectified by
lumping these unsubstantiated species back together – as happened with the
isabella quagga, subsequently being subsumed by zoologists into the normal quagga
species (now subspecies).
Hamilton Smith's undated full-colour wtarcolour painting of
the isabella quagga (public domain)
As for
the full-colour isabella quagga illustration: it is an undated watercolour painting, again by Hamilton Smith, and is contained with various others of his watercolours in an unpublished manuscript by him held in the library and archives of London's Natural History Museum. Moreover, this beautiful painting remained unpublished until as recently as 2010, when it appeared in a Zeitschrift des Kolner Zoos article on quaggas by Lothar Schwahle and Wolfgang Wozniak.
Hamilton Smith's two illustrations readily confirm my early deductions as to
the isabella quagga's likely appearance – namely, an aberrantly pale,
isabelline-coloured quagga with only very faint, white striping.
Having
viewed several comprehensive lists of quagga material currently housed in
museums worldwide, I can confirm Lydekker's statement that the isabella quagga
skin deposited by Burchell at what is now London's Natural History Museum is no
longer there, and is therefore lost. Presumably it was discarded due to its
very poor condition, but a tragic loss nonetheless of such an exceptional,
unique specimen, and which nowadays might well have yielded much useful
information via DNA tests conducte3d upon samples of this skin's tissues.
Yet
despite the isabella quagga having long since been reduced in status from a
taxonomically-discrete species to a non-taxonomic mutant oddity, its delicate
pallid beauty deserves to be remembered and celebrated. So I am very glad that
I discovered this elegant animal hidden away as the briefest of footnotes within
the dusty archives of the past, and have been able to revive it, even if only
in words and pictures, within this present article, written
up at last.
Alongside
a mounted quagga specimen at Tring Natural History Museum, England (© Dr Karl
Shuker)