Dr KARL SHUKER

Zoologist, media consultant, and science writer, Dr Karl Shuker is also one of the best known cryptozoologists in the world. He is the author of such seminal works as Mystery Cats of the World (1989), The Lost Ark: New and Rediscovered Animals of the 20th Century (1993; greatly expanded in 2012 as The Encyclopaedia of New and Rediscovered Animals), Dragons: A Natural History (1995), In Search of Prehistoric Survivors (1995), The Unexplained (1996), From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings (1997), Mysteries of Planet Earth (1999), The Hidden Powers of Animals (2001), The Beasts That Hide From Man (2003), Extraordinary Animals Revisited (2007), Dr Shuker's Casebook (2008), Karl Shuker's Alien Zoo: From the Pages of Fortean Times (2010), Cats of Magic, Mythology, and Mystery (2012), Mirabilis: A Carnival of Cryptozoology and Unnatural History (2013), Dragons in Zoology, Cryptozoology, and Culture (2013), The Menagerie of Marvels (2014), A Manifestation of Monsters (2015), Here's Nessie! (2016), and what is widely considered to be his cryptozoological magnum opus, Still In Search Of Prehistoric Survivors (2016) - plus, very excitingly, his four long-awaited, much-requested ShukerNature blog books (2019-2024).

Dr Karl Shuker's Official Website - http://www.karlshuker.com/index.htm

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my ShukerNature blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my published books (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Eclectarium blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Starsteeds blog's poetry and other lyrical writings (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my Shuker In MovieLand blog's articles (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

IMPORTANT: To view a complete, regularly-updated listing of my RebelBikerDude's AI Biker Art blog's thematic text & picture galleries (each one instantly clickable), please click HERE!

Search This Blog


PLEASE COME IN, I'VE BEEN EXPECTING YOU...

PLEASE COME IN, I'VE BEEN EXPECTING YOU...
WELCOME TO SHUKERNATURE - ENJOY YOUR VISIT - BEWARE OF THE RAPTOR!


Saturday, 12 July 2025

SPOTTING A SPOTTED BUSHBUCK IN LIBERIA

 
A typically-patterned male northern bushbuck in Senegal (© Lucy Keith-Diagne/Wikipedia – CC BY 4.0 licence)

Bushbucks are the smallest members of the spiral-horned African antelope group, which also include the kudus, nyalas, sitatunga, elands, and bongo. Traditionally, just a single bushbuck species has been recognized, Tragelaphus scriptus, albeit with numerous subspecies (some of which long ago were briefly deemed by certain 'splitter' mammalogists to be species in their own right before being 'lumped' into T. scriptus), distributed through much of sub-Saharan Africa. More recently however, it has been split taxonomically into two – the northern bushbuck, native to western and northern/central Africa, which retains the binomial name T. scriptus; and the Cape bushbuck T. sylvaticus, native to southern and eastern Africa.

Moreover, in the Cape bushbuck both sexes are generally brown, often with only limited coat patterning on the torso, even in the more showy male (though more strikingly patterned individuals do sometimes occur). Conversely, the northern bushbuck is the more familiar form, patterned as its torso is (most especially in the adult male) with a diverse, eyecatching arrangement of vertical white stripes on its flanks and often also a horizontal lower flank stripe lying beneath them plus a couple of horizontal shoulder stripes, all of them again white, as well as a series of white spots on its haunches. The overall effect is as if this antelope is wearing a harness, which is why a popular longstanding alternative name for the bushbuck as a whole has always been the harnessed antelope, but which is nowadays applied specifically to the northern species.

 
Adult female northern bushbucvk with calf in Ghana (© Lalambala/Wikipedia – CC BY-SA 4.0 licence)

However, as will now be revealed, there is one northern bushbuck specimen on record whose coat patterning is dramatically different from that of any other bushbuck of any kind – so much so, in fact, that veteran cryptozoologist Dr Bernard Heuvelmans deemed it worthy of being investigated as potentially representing an entirely discrete but currently undescribed species in its own right. In addition, its extraordinary skin is apparently still preserved in a museum. Yet this unique, fascinating individual and its very intriguing history have never been fully documented in any English-language publication – until now, that is, via this worldwide ShukerNature exclusive. So, let's begin at the beginning of this very belated bushbuck revelation.

I first learned of this singular specimen during the mid-1980s, when browsing through Heuvelmans's lengthy but thoroughly engrossing paper 'Annotated Checklist of Apparently Unknown Animals With Which Cryptozoology is Concerned', a paper that I have since returned to countless times during my own researches. It was published in Vol. 5 of Cryptozoology, the official scientific journal of the now-defunct International Society of Cryptozoology, and in it Heuvelmans briefly documented dozens of cryptids, many of which were very obscure and hitherto-unknown to me, arranged geographically and via habitat, with each cryptid's entry supplemented by one or more source references. Here is Heuvelmans's entry for the mystery bushbuck:

A small, entirely spotted bushbuck antelope, known only from an incomplete skin (preserved in the Zoological Museum of Berlin University) from Liberia (Pathé 1940).

The reference cited by him is: Pathé, Moritz (1940). Die Suche nach dem Fabeltier [The Search For The Mythical Creature]. Deutscher Verlag (Berlin).

 
The front of the dustjacket for Pathé's above-cited book, illustrated with one of his own paintings – note the spotted bushbuck skin sticking partly out of one of his cases (public domain)

Moritz Pathé (1893-1956) was a prolific and very talented German artist and book illustrator, specializing in animal pictures, and the author of several works, documenting his travels in Africa seeking rare creatures to portray, but also to hunt and trap.

Yet despite searching for more information concerning Pathé's enigmatic antelope, I was unable to locate any, and eventually it slipped from my mind. A few weeks ago, however, my interest in it was revived when palaeontologist and fellow cryptozoological writer Dr Darren Naish contacted me to enquire whether I had any information on file regarding it. As I still hadn't, Darren's query inspired me to launch another search, and this time, finally, I achieved success, thanks to two longstanding friends who both share my enthusiasm for all matters of a cryptozoological kind.

The first of these was French crypto-scholar Michel Raynal, who kindly supplied me with a copy of the principal chapter from Pathé's book in which he documented the Liberian spotted bushback (the entire book featured it, as it was the mythical animal referred to in the title, but this particular chapter contained the most significant information concerning it). Although the text was in German, I would normally have experienced no problems with translating it, but as various of you may know, for quite some time now I have been afflicted with a close-up vision problem (happily, my distance vision is unaffected) that makes reading and on-screen research difficult at present (an operation to correct this condition should be taking place soon). Consequently, translating many pages of German into English is presently beyond my capabilities.

Moreover, because the font employed in the book is a very ornate one that was commonly used in German publications back in the days when Pathé's book was published, blocking and pasting the text in sections into Google Translate and other translation sites also failed, because its ornate font rendered the text unreadable by the online translators.

But then one of my German crypto-friends, Markus Hemmler, came to my rescue, generously providing me with an immensely useful English translation of the relevant chapter (annotated by him with some very informative explanatory notes), plus other excerpts, as well as a copy of a colour plate from it (as did Michel) that contained Pathé's own very detailed illustrations of the skin, showing it dorsally and laterally, and which I've included here, as you'll see below. Markus subsequently also supplied me with an image of the full-colour illustrated dustjacket of Pathé's book (shown above here), the illustration being one of the author's own paintings, plus some of his line-drawings that appeared inside the book. All of these will be revealed later here.

First of all, however, here is a summary of the pertinent information regarding the spotted bushbuck as provided by Pathé in the principal chapter of his book devoted to it plus some references to it that appeared in subsequent chapters:

In 1937, Pathé was spending time in the West African country of Liberia, with the express purpose of hunting, drawing, and painting various of its more exotic animal species, in particular the pygmy hippopotamus and the crowned eagle. But a fortuitous meeting with a youth offering for sale a truly extraordinary albeit incomplete antelope skin changed the course of his plans completely, so that much of his time there was instead spent seeking a living example of this exceptionally elusive, ostensibly mythical, yet (by virtue of the afore-mentioned physical, tangible skin) unequivocally real creature, even inspiring the title of the book that he would write about his adventures.

To quote from one of Markus's annotations to his English translation of the relevant sections from Pathé's book:

At the beginning of the book Pathé already is in Monrovia [Liberia's capital] and until page 92 he describes some adventures like the journey from Monrovia (via Mesurado River, Stockton Creek to St. Paul River, then over land to Royersville at the Po River and beyond this river into the jungle) to Bangatown at the Lofa River [in northwestern Liberia] and his experiences and exploration of the surrounding area.

And so it was that one day during his stay in Bangatown, Pathé received an unexpected visitor in the form of a native youth named Jimmy, about 20 years old and hailing from a small village far upriver in the neighbouring but still quite distant Gola region. Jimmy had been hoping to sell the skin on behalf of his uncle to some people with whom his father and uncle had done business before, but for various reasons he failed to sell it to them. However, being mindful of Pathé's reputation as a hunter, Jimmy had then brought the skin to him, in case he may wish to buy it, and as Pathé had never seen anything like it before, he swiftly did so.

 
A b/w illustration by Pathé from his book, depicting Jimmy holding the spotted bushbuck skin (public domain)

According to Jimmy, who also had never seen one like it before, the antelope had been shot by a native hunter somewhere in Gola. Jimmy stated that he did not know specifically where, but eventually revealed that the hunter had mentioned a distant spot on the Mahé River, a tributary of the afore-mentioned Lofa River..

Pathé decided to hire Jimmy as his hunting boy, offering him both pay and on-the-job training if he accepted, which the youth instantly did, promising to return in a week's time and begin his exciting new career, which again he did.

The book then digresses, pursuing other topics such as the successful search by Pathé and Jimmy for a crowned eagle that Pathé hoped to paint, but on p. 110 he returns to the anomalous antelope skin, which becomes his principal focus thereafter. Yet what was so special about it? Here is the earlier-mentioned colour plate containing three illustrations of it by Pathé:

 
Three colour paintings of the mystery spotted antelope skin, the first one being a concept image of what it may have looked like with its legs still present; all three prepared by Pathé (public domain)

As seen, the skin lacked its head and limbs, but those were not relevant in relation to what instantly set it apart from all known antelopes, which was its remarkable patterning. Although its species appeared at the very least to be akin to the bushbuck, this skin lacked the latter's characteristic white stripes and posterior white dappling. Instead, and incongruously, its back and much of its flanks were heavily patterned with black spots, which in its dorsal and upper dorso-lateral regions had coalesced and congealed so extensively that a solid mass of black pigmentation had resulted.

Could this extraordinary creature represent a hitherto-undescribed species in its own right, or was it a very distinctive, aberrant specimen of the known northern bushbuck? Pathé personally appeared far from sure, because during the course of his book his opinion oscillated back and forth constantly between these two options.

When I first saw his paintings of it, I immediately thought of two remarkable leopards that had been shot in the vicinity of Grahamstown, South Africa, during the 1880s (click here to see my documentation and pictures of them on ShukerNature; they are also chronicled in my three books on mystery cats). Dubbed melanotic at that time (but a term rarely used today), in each of these aberrant individuals the typical black-pigmented leopard rosettes had broken up on the flanks into tiny but very profuse black spots that in the upper dorso-lateral and dorsal regions had amalgamated into solid or near-solid expanses of black pigmentation, just as was exhibited by Pathé's singular bushbuck specimen.

In the case of the Grahamstown leopards (similar cases are also on record featuring other leopards, tigers, and at least one jaguar individual known to me), this abnormal patterning is nowadays referred to as pseudo-melanism, distinguishing it from true melanism.

For in the latter condition (which is responsible for all-black leopard specimens aka black panthers, and all-black individuals in many other animal species too), the pelage's black rosettes of the individual in question are unaffected but its background colour is abnormally dark, so much so in fact that it often obscures the presence of the rosettes. Conversely, as described above, in pseudo-melanism the background colour of the individual's pelage remains its usual shade but is virtually obscured dorsally and dorso-laterally by abnormal amalgamation and coalescing of the black rosettes into large expanses of solid black pigmentation plus intense black speckling elsewhere on the flanks.

 
Illustration from the 1880s depicting the dorsal view of the second melanotic Grahamstown leopard's skin, clearly revealing its remarkable pseudo-melanistic patterning, which is ostensibly reminiscent of the spotted bushbuck's patterning (public domain)

However, the fundamental problem with seeking to identify the spotted bushbuck skin as that of a pseudo-melanistic specimen is that in typical bushbuck specimens their markings are white, not black. So as bushbucks never normally possess any black markings at all, I cannot conceive how pseudo-melanism could create this specimen's unique pattern of black-pigmented spots and coalesced black spotting.

In contrast, it is possible that the skin represents an example of incomplete true melanism, whereby instead of the pelage of the individual in question being black all over, it exhibits melanism only in certain body regions, such as its back and flanks, for instance. In some cases involving very discrete, localized body regions, this is known as mozaicism, with one famous example being that of Ranger, a male lion born during the 1970s at Glasgow Zoo (then called Calder Park Zoo). His parents were of normal colouration, but he exhibited a large black region on his chest plus another one on his right foreleg (click here to see my documentation of Ranger on ShukerNature).

Whatever the precise explanation for this bushbuck skin's aberrant appearance, however, it is hardly surprising that Pathé was so interested it – but he was not the only one.

 
A sketch by Pathé of the spotted bushbuck's incomplete skin in dorsal view that appears on the cloth binding of his book's front cover (normally hidden beneath the dustjacket) (public domain)

Not long after purchasing the skin from Jimmy, Pathé received a visit from a renowned big game hunter/explorer of English-African-Indian heritage named Charles Sandiputt. He made a living from shooting rare specimens for rich Western clients and then charging them steeply for the privilege of acquiring these greatly-desired trophies, but he was currently running low both on funds and on gun cartridges, and hoped to purchase some of the latter from Pathé. While conversing, Pathé naively showed Sandiputt the spotted bushbuck skin, and although the hunter tried to disguise his excitement, it was clear to Pathé how very interested he was in it.

Sure enough, after examining the skin in detail, Sandiputt offered Pathé a sizeable sum of money for it (despite having pleaded poverty earlier), and also offered to go hunting with him in search of additional specimens. This last-mentioned offer in particular was an abrupt about-face to say the least, after just moments earlier having turned down Pathé's own suggestion for them to go hunting together, but that of course was before he'd seen the spotted bushbuck skin!

However, Pathé refused both of the hunter's offers, having realized by now that he'd made a mistake in revealing the skin's existence to Sandiputt, who departed not long afterwards without having secured from Pathé not only the skin but also any specific details regarding who had shot the animal itself and where. Some days later, however, Sandiputt surreptitiously reappeared, and was caught by Pathé questioning his native helpers on this very same subject, but having already been prompted by Pathé not to divulge any details about it to anyone, they remained tight-lipped.

To cut a lengthy story short: After Sandiputt had exited empty-handed a second time, Pathé soon sent Jimmy back to his Gola homeland to find the hunter from there who had shot the freak bushbuck, and secure his services in a search for living specimens, which Jimmy did. Pathé dubbed the hunter Bill, who then led Pathé and his hunting party to the mountainous regions upstream of the Little Mahé River in Gola. Here, with Jimmy serving as translator, Bill claimed to have not merely shot the specimen whose skin was now a closely-guarded possession of Pathé (he even took it with him on their Gola hunt, in order to ensure that it was not stolen in their absence if left unguarded back at Bangatown) but also to have seen several additional living specimens.

However, the hunt for these elusive antelopes proved unsuccessful, due in no small way to Pathé's alarming discovery that Sandiputt was also seeking these creatures in this very same vicinity and at the very same time as them, and that – in an example of devious intrigue worthy of high politics or industrial espionage – Bill was a veritable double agent. For he had already been contacted and cunningly hired in secret by Sandiputt to tire out Pathé's party so that they would quit the search and return to Bangatown, leaving behind Bill who would then lead Sandiputt in his own search, assisted by the local villages' inhabitants to whom Sandiputt had promised a big reward for a skin or information concerning where such antelopes could be found alive. Furthermore, Bill was to steal Pathé's boat too for travelling up the Mahé River, as Sandiputt didn't have access to one himself!

 
Bill with Charles Sandiputt, drawn by Pathé (public domain)

Ultimately, however, Sandiputt's dastardly ploy was all in vain, with none of his unscrupulous plans coming to fruition, because the ever-loyal Jimmy had made sure that Bill did not steal Pathé's boat, and neither party encountered any spotted bushbucks anyway (though Pathé did make a somewhat paradoxical claim that he and Bill briefly spied two such creatures together, only to directly contradict himself a little later in his book by saying that he had failed to find any – very strange). Ultimately, however, everyone returned home in apparent defeat, certainly with their respective quests for actual skins unfulfilled. But even then, the story was not quite over.

For not long after Pathé had arrived back in Bangatown with his party, his hut suffered an unexplained break-in, with no fewer than four of his locked iron cases and trunks having been forced open, yet nothing inside them had been taken. Bearing in mind that Pathé had been keeping the precious bushbuck skin locked in just such a case (he had several of them in his hut), he naturally suspected that whoever had broken in was seeking the skin but had chosen the wrong cases. Presumably, moreover, as Pathé's remaining cases (including the one that did contain the skin) had not been tampered with, the would-be burglar(s) must have come close to being disturbed, causing them to flee before having chance to force open any of the others.

Despite a thorough investigation taking place, no culprit was ever identified or apprehended, but Pathé reflected extensively upon the indisputable fact that when Sandiputt had first visited him, the hunter had witnessed him taking the skin out of one of these cases, so Sandiputt had been aware thereafter that this is where it was being kept. Moreover, Sandiputt had reappeared at Bangatown just a short time before the burglary had taken place (his excuse for doing so being that he wished to return Pathé's loaned cartridges to him), so he was known to have been in this precise location at that precise time. Coincidence?

After describing a feverish dream in which he had shot a spotted bushbuck, only to wake up and find that it had all been nothing more than a hallucination, and that it was now Christmas Day, Pathé made plans to travel back to Liberia's capital Monrovia and thence to Germany, duly arriving home in early 1938. Pathé had always planned to make his zoologically-valuable, unique spotted bushbuck skin freely available to science, so although it took him several months after returning to Germany before he actually did so, Pathé finally fulfilled his vow by donating it to the Zoological Museum at the Humboldt University of Berlin. In response, he received the following written communication from the then head of its mammal department, the eminent German zoologist Prof. Hermann Pohle (and which is translated here by Markus):

Dear Mr Pathé!

Thank you very much for sending me the fur from Monrovia. At first glance, I could see that no wild animal from which it could have come is known. A careful comparison then revealed that no domestic animal of this coloration is known either. Therefore, it is an unknown species or breed. Unfortunately, the fur is very incomplete; it is missing the head and legs. Therefore, it is unsuitable for a new description. It would therefore be of great value if you were able to travel to Liberia again and capture a complete animal, at least the fur and skull of one specimen.

Needless to say, however, Pathé did not do so, as WW2 would soon be changing the face of the world forever. Incidentally, Pohle's contemplation as to whether a domestic animal identity was tenable for the supposed spotted bushbuck pelt is intriguing, especially as there are speckled domestic goats, for example, whose torso pelts do recall that of the spotted bushbuck. Taking this line of thought further, one might even wonder if its head and limbs had been deliberately removed by its originator (Bill?) in order to disguise the fact that this is indeed all that it really was, just a domestic creature, not a wild animal at all. This certainly wouldn't be the first time that such subterfuge has happened with mysterious mammal specimens. However, Pohle seemed adamant that this was not the case here. and he was an extremely knowledgeable, experienced mammalogist, so I see no reason to disbelieve him - but recently ia much more serious issue has arisen regarding Pathé's specimen.

As is so depressingly frequent in sagas of physical, tangible cryptozoological specimens, Markus made a worrying discovery when he recently contacted the museum for information concerning the skin. Can you guess what he discovered? Yes indeed, there was no entry either for the skin itself or for the name Pathé on the museum collection's database! However, as he did learn, the collection isn't fully digitized as yet, so the skin may still turn up there, lurking meanwhile in anonymity somewhere within the museum's capacious basement, perhaps? Also, the database isn't accessible online at present anyway, after having gone offline in 2024 due to a cyber-attack, but hopefully at some stage in the future it will reappear online, enabling external researchers like Markus and myself to peruse it directly ourselves.

 
A sketch by Pathé from his book, depicting how he conceived the spotted bushbuck might have looked in life (public domain)

Also of note is that Markus succeeded in obtaining from the archives of Berlin's Natural History Museum seven pages of written correspondence between Pathé and Pohle, but there was only a single very brief reference in them to the spotted bushbuck. Namely, in a letter to Pathé dated 25 October 1946, Pohle expressed optimism that Pathé would soon resume travel back to Liberia (now that WW2 was over), and stated: "It seems to me that you must now finally find the mythical creature and bring it back, even if it is only a domestic animal", but as already noted here, that never happened, and given the unverified nature of its continuing presence in the Humboldt University Zoological Museum's collection, Pathé's spotted bushbuck skin is an even bigger enigma now than it was before!

And on that unsatisfactory, unresolved note, with its very existence, let alone its taxonomic or genetic identiy, an ongoing mystery, we must bid adieu at least for the time being to the anomalous antelope constituting the subject of this present ShukerNature article – the most comprehensive coverage of it ever published in the English language. Markus plans to prepare a German-language counterpart, which will be posted in due course in his own blog, and when it appears there I shall add a clickable link to it here.

Lastly, one of the most unexpected aspects of this entire saga is that Pathé does not appear to have actually stated anywhere in his book the precise year when his search for the spotted bushbuck took place, but due to some masterfully Sherlockian detective work by Markus, it seems safe to say that it was in 1937. This is because Markus uncovered a short newspaper report published on 28 April 1938 by the Bergische Post, in which it mentions that Pathé "has just returned from Liberia". Recalling that Pathé had specifically referred in his book to spending Christmas there, just before leaving Liberia to return home to Germany, this clearly identifies the year that he spent in Liberia as 1937.

If any additional news regarding the spotted bushbuck skin emerges, I'll include it here as an update. Meanwhile, my sincerest thanks go to Markus Hemmler and Michel Raynal for very kindly making so much relevant information available to me, thereby making my preparation of this article possible.

 
A vintage photograph of Moritz Pathé, from his book Mit Büchse und Palette im westafrikanischen Urwald (Franz Schneider Verlag: Berlin, 1944) (public domain)

 

Thursday, 5 June 2025

MANIFESTING THE MULILO - A RAINBOW-SUMMONED HILL-DRAGON, OR A LOATHSOME BLACK SLUG-SNAKE?

 
Might the mulilo – if it exists – look something like this? (created by Dr Karl Shuker using Dream Lab)

In more than 40 years of cryptozoological researches and writings, I have been proud and privileged to introduce to the cryptozoological community and beyond a considerable number and notable diversity of cryptids whose details had been hitherto consigned to obscure, overlooked periodicals, books, and other passed-over publications. One such mystery beast is the mulilo, whose details I uncovered in a long-since-forgotten Empire Review article, but which I duly documented and discussed in one of my own books, From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings, first published in 1997, and which was the very first crypto-themed publication to include it.

 
My book From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings (© Dr Karl Shuker)

Today, conversely, numerous online websites have also documented this creature, but as far as I can tell their coverages are merely paraphrasings  of my book's original version, with no new, additional content  Yet my book is seldom referenced as their source, sadly.

Consequently, coupled with the regrettable fact that certain of these online paraphrased coverages are far from accurate iterations of mine anyway, I've decided to present on ShukerNature my book's original, concise account of the mysterious mulilo – so here it is.

Dream a dream of a mysterious dragon that only appears when a rainbow is resting upon the vivid, viridescent hillsides of Zaire [now the Democratic Republic of Congo] and Zambia – a creature whose reality is widely accepted by many native people in these tropical African countries. One might expect such an Arcadian, picturesque scenario to inspire images of a bright, evanescent entity with sparkling opalescent scales, a proud noble head of classical profile, and sweeping, polychromatic butterfly wings – a golden, glittering creature of Faerie, of heady sunlit reverie.

Yet nothing could be further from the truth, because the image that these people do visualize when contemplating this creature is an evocation of much darker dreams. According to their belief, Central Africa's rainbow-summoned dragon, known as the mulilo, is a gigantic, coal-black, slug-like beast of loathsome form, almost 6 ft in length, over 1 ft in width, and leaving death in its wake – the deadly legacy of its poisonous breath.

 
Could the mulilo be a giant black slug? (created by Dr Karl Shuker using Grok X1)

One could certainly be forgiven for considering the mulilo to be nothing more than a fanciful folktale. Yet as reported in 1940 by W.L. Speight within an Empire Review article on African mystery beasts, a living, corporeal animal is apparently involved, because pieces of blackened flesh said to be from dead mulilos are worn by some natives as fertility charms.

There is no known species of slug that attains the size attributed to the mulilo; in any event, the bodies of slugs are relatively insubstantial, little more than slender gelatinous sacs - hardly the likeliest of materials to remain intact for utilization as charms. Perhaps, therefore, the blackened flesh is really from a slug-like snake, or even a serpentine salamander (like the sirens of North America).

Even so, the thorny question remains as to whether this corporeal creature is truly the mulilo, or whether its flesh is merely used by the natives to vindicate their belief in what is actually a non-existent, wholly mythical beast? If the flesh is from a mulilo (regardless of what species it may belong to), how do the natives obtain it?

 
Another giant black slug-inspired mulilo representation (created by Dr Karl Shuker using Grok X1)

According to Speight, they set a trap – building a secure cage, lined internally with sharp blades, and baited with a living cockerel. Then they simply wait each night, and listen. On the morning that no cock-crow is heard, the natives celebrate and journey joyfully to the cage – for they know that inside it they will find the mulilo, dead, impaled upon the blades during its capture of the cockerel.

Yet despite this apparently successful method of obtaining mulilo remains, the mulilo is as mysterious and unidentified today as it was when documented by Speight over half a century ago [almost a full century ago now]. Moreover, it does not even seem to have been reported again. Perhaps rainbows have been rare in Zaire and Zambia lately?

My view concerning the mulilo that I held back in the late 1990s remains unchanged today, almost 30 years later. Namely, that if it is indeed a real, flesh-and-blood entity, it is most likely to be some form of black-scaled snake, possibly a fairly thick-bodied or sturdy one, perhaps even a melanistic variety of a species already known to science.

Over the years I have documented a number of times with a variety of different examples that in the culture of many indigenous peoples from around the world, aberrant animal specimens, such as melanistic, albinistic, or extra-large individuals, for instance, are often categorised by them as being fundamentally (rather than merely superficially) distinct, wholly separate creatures from normal specimens of the same species, and are even given wholly separate names by them.

 
Is the mulilo based upon an unusual melanistic variety of snake? (created by Dr Karl Shuker using Dream Lab)

So if the mulilo were indeed nothing more than an all-black form of a known snake species but deemed special by the locals on account of its unexpected colouration, this would not be in any way surprising.

In addition, certain snakes, especially large meat-eating constricting species such as the African pythons, are notorious for the foul stench of their breath. So if the mulilo is simply a melanistic version of one such species, this could plausibly explain native testimony (conceivably somewhat exaggerated or embellished if retold to the more ingenuous of Westerners?) relating to its allegedly poisonous exhalations.

 
A large and sturdy melanistic specimen of constricting snake might inspire superstitious fear among local people encountering it (created by Dr Karl Shuker using Magic Studio)

If only further details could be obtained. So if anyone reading this ShukerNature article is aware of any addition information appertaining to the mulili, I'd love to hear from you, so please comment below with your news – many thanks indeed!

Excerpted from my book From Flying Toads To Snakes With Wings (Llewellyn: St Paul, 1997).

 
An intriguing image generated by Dream Lab, combining the serpentine scaly body of a melanistic snake with slug-like cephalic tentacles – the perfect mulilo? (created by Dr Karl Shuker using Dream Lab)

 

Friday, 18 April 2025

SHUKERNATURE IS #1 – CONFIRMING WHAT MY COUNTLESS LOYAL SHUKERNATURE FANS AND FOLLOWERS HAVE ALWAYS KNOWN!

 
FeedSpot's official opening image to its listing of the 15 Best UK Nature Blogs in 2025 (© FeedSpot)

Ever since I launched it way back in January 2009, my ShukerNature blog has consistently received praise, plaudits, and even some awards, based upon its content, which has always been judged to be entertaining, interesting, eminently reliable, and extremely educational – and for which I am exceedingly grateful to everyone concerned, most especially its countless loyal fans and followers.

Now I am delighted to announce that my blog has garnered a further award. On 12 April 2025, as I was kindly informed this week by its founder and creators account manager Anuj Agarwal, the blog database website FeedSpot has awarded ShukerNature its premier, #1 position in the blogs section of its new listing of the 15 Best UK Nature Blogs and Websites in 2025!! Please click here to view the entire listing.

Nor is that all. ShukerNature also appears at #18 in FeedSpot's Best 90 Nature Blogs worldwide! Click here to view the entire listing.

My sincere thanks to Anuj, FeedSpot, and to all of you, my readers, for making this happen – I am truly grateful!!

The official Top UK Nature Blog medal awarded by FeedSpot to ShukerNature in April 2025 (© FeedSpot)

 

Monday, 31 March 2025

A DICYNODONT DEPICTION?

 
Life restoration of Dicynodon lacerticeps, a dicynodont from the Late Permian, South Africa (© ДиБгд-Wikipedia – CC BY 4.0 licence)

A farm named La Belle France, situated at Brackfontein Ridge in the Karoo region of South Africa's Free State Province, has long been known for the exquisite cave paintings on the wall of a cave in its grounds – and especially for one particular painting dubbed the Horned Serpent, which bears no resemblance to any known animal alive today. Its curved, elongate, spotted body has four paddle-like limbs and a small head but bearing a pair of very large downward-curving tusks, giving it a resemblance to the head of a walrus (it has actually been dubbed a jungle walrus in cryptozoological writings after its similarity to a jungle-inhabiting African mystery beast reported by an explorer). But there have never been walruses in this area, ever. So unless it is simply wholly imaginary, a spirit beast, what could this depicted creature represent?

Cryptozoologists have speculated whether it may have been some form of aquatic sabre-tooth tiger, an idea dating back at least as far as Bernard Heuvelmans's writings in his 1978 book Les Derniers Dragons d'Afrique, and which I have already documented in detail here on ShukerNature.

 
The 'Horned Serpent' petroglyph (public domain)

However, a wholly new and very convincing identity has now been proposed, in a thought-provoking PLoS ONE paper authored by Dr Julien Benoit, from the Evolutionary Studies Institute and School of Geosciences, at the University of the Witwatersrand, in Johannesburg (click here to access it, and here to access a popular-format article regarding it in The Conversation). The cave paintings were produced by the San people, formerly known as the Bushmen of the East, indigenous hunter-gatherers who no longer inhabit this particular region, but were well aware of the wildlife around them and were accomplished artists, portraying such creatures in their cave paintings. The San left this area in 1835, which therefore means that this is the latest date by which the Horned Serpent painting could have been produced by them. However, it may have been made much earlier, because the San had lived here for thousands of years, and in this very same area are countless fossils that may well provide the answer to the mystery of the Horned Serpent's zoological identity, as Benoit has proposed.

The fossils are mostly of ancient reptiles known as dicynodonts, which became extinct here around 250 million years ago, during the Upper Permian Period. The principal species is Dicynodon lacerticeps, averaging 4 ft in total length, whose squat body and four fairly stout limbs render it relatively undistinguished in appearance – except, that is, for its single pair of very sizeable, downward-curving, tusk-like teeth. Benoit had previously discovered that the San people inhabiting Lesotho, which neighbours South Africa's Free State, had incorporated depictions of fossil dinosaur footprints into their cave paintings there, so he has now proposed that the South African Karoo's Horned Serpent was their attempt to reconstruct, like veritable proto-palaeontologists, the appearance in life of the long-extinct dicynodonts, because its tusked head does bear a distinct resemblance to fossil dicynodont skulls and teeth present in this same area.

 
A fossil Dicynodon skull (© Ghedoghedo/Wikipedia – CC BY-SA 3.0 licence)

Put another way, it is certainly a most notable coincidence that a mysterious tusked beast should be depicted by indigenous artists in the same region where fossil skulls and teeth of a distinctively tusked species are commonly found. But that is not all. To quote Benoit:

The body of the tusked animal from La Belle France [Horned Serpent], as painted by the San, is strangely flexed like a banana, a pose that is commonly encountered on fossil skeletons and is called the "death pose" by palaeontologists. Its body is also covered with spots, not unlike the mummified dicynodonts found in the area whose skin is covered with bumps.

It seems likely, therefore, that the longstanding mystery concerning what the Horned Serpent cave painting represents, and whose existence was first brought to widespread attention almost a century ago, in 1930, is now finally solved - or is it?

 
The Horned Serpent petroglyph seen in situ,  alongside petroglyphs of certain other mysterious, unidentifiable creatures (public domain)

For the Horned Serpent is not the only mysterious, ostensibly unidentified beast portrayed in this series of petroglyphs - in fact, there are several others depicted alongside it, all of which remain resolutely unexplained by the dicynodont identification.

This leads me to wonder whether these illustrated mystery beasts are nothing more than wholly fabulous creatures of the imagination - San equivalents to Western unicorns, centaurs, dragons, and the like, perhaps?

 
Two of the nowadays palaeontologically-inaccurate but still historically-significant life-sized dicynodont sculptures created during the early 1850s by English sculptor Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins for display at southeast London's Crystal Palace Park and which, along with many other sculptures of prehistoric fauna prepared by him, can still be seen today at Dinosaur Court in Crystal Palace Park (© Ben Sutherland/Wikipedia – CC BY 2.0 licence)
 
NB - an extensive documentation of their history and also that of the cryptozoological jungle walrus linked to the Horned Serpent petroglyph can be found in my book ShukerNature  Book 3: Crystal Palace Dinosaurs, Jungle Walruses, and Other Belated Blog Beasts