On 29 November 2018, fellow UK
cryptozoologist Richard Freeman brought to my attention a most intriguing
article (click here
to access it), written by Zineb Boujrada and posted earlier that year on Culture
Trip's website, concerning a hitherto-obscure East African aquatic cryptid. Djibouti's so-called Island of the
Devil (Goubbet Al-Kharab) earns its name from a terrifying sea monster called
the sheytan (translated as 'devil') that locals vehemently believe exists in
the bay (the Goubbet) surrounding the island.
Making this account especially interesting
was its inclusion of what seemed to be a truly extraordinary and very
noteworthy claim if true. Namely, that no less eminent a maritime expert than
France's internationally famous undersea explorer and diver Jacques Cousteau
had not only obtained proof of the sheytan's reality but also "insisted it
never be revealed to humanity".
Quoting from Boujrada's Culture Trip
article:
According to local newspapers at the time, Cousteau
and his team conducted an experiment to explore the depths of the Goubbet by
submerging a camel carcass in a cage. To their surprise, as they took it out of
the water, they discovered that the cage had been entirely smashed and
deformed, resulting in the disappearance of the carcass.
All of this was entirely new to me, so I
lost no time in posting links to Boujrada's article on my various Facebook
cryptozoology-related groups in the hope of eliciting further information or
clarification. Happily, assistance soon came, courtesy of veteran French
cryptozoologist Michel Raynal, who duly informed me on 30 November that the
local Djibouti newspapers' claims were unfounded rumour, and that in 1971
Cousteau had publicly denied it in one of his own books, Life and Death in a
Coral Sea (with Michel kindly sending me a copy of the relevant section
from it).
As this incident appears never to have
attracted specific cryptozoological attention prior to my subsequent
documentation of it in my Alien Zoo column for Fortean Times, however, I am presenting herewith Cousteau's own
statement as contained in his book:
...we decided to visit the Goubet, a famous gulf of
the Red Sea. Before leaving Djibouti that morning, one of our crew had by
chance asked a local Arab diver about the Goubet. "Ah, sir," the man
had replied, "it is a most extraordinary place. It is bottomless, and it
is inhabited by monsters so large that they can drag down lines attached to
200-liter cans. Moreover, in 1963, Commandant Cousteau went there with Fredéric
Dumas and his best divers, and they were so terrified by what they saw that
they ran away."
Naturally, we were eager to see the place in which,
according to local gossip, we had earned so ignominious a reputation. I must
report, however, that the Goubet was a disappointment. It is an inland sea or
gulf that connects with the Red Sea by a narrow pass in which there is a very
strong current, running up to seven knots. The surrounding area is very
beautiful, and very wild, being dominated by volcanic mountains bare of foliage
and marked in shades of red, yellow, and black.
Once in the Goubet itself, we lowered the diving
saucer to a depth of over six hundred feet without catching sight of even a
small monster. The divers then suited up and went down also, but they saw
nothing more remarkable than some very large sea urchins. There seemed to be
very few fish of any kind. It is my guess that the "Goubet monster"
of Arab legend was originally a manta ray, seen by some shepherd from a hill top.
Manta rays are plentiful in this area, and it must happen occasionally that
they wander into the Goubet and – because the inlet is so narrow and because
mantas are not the most intelligent of beasts – have trouble finding their way
out again.
Consequently, it would seem that either the
sheytan is real but remained remarkably well hidden when Cousteau conducted his
actual, genuine search for it, or it is indeed just a monstrous local legend. Worth
noting, incidentally, is that a commonly-used colloquial name for the giant
manta ray Manta birostris is the
devil-fish (click here
for more details). Alternatively, as this term has also been used in relation
to giant squids and octopuses, perhaps if it truly exists the sheytan might be
a gargantuan cephalopod, especially as mantas are pelagic creatures, not
deepsea ones, whereas giant squids do inhabit deep waters. My thanks to Richard
and Michel for alerting and assisting me in my investigation of this curious case.
In view of how the sheytan allegedly inhabits great depths and
drags down lines to these depths, if it truly exists might it be some form of
giant deepsea octopus? (public domain)
Strange that Cousteau remarks that Manta Rays are not the most intelligent of creatures whereas other notable oceanographic experts state opposite views on this assumption.
ReplyDeleteCousteau's remarks are 50 years out of date. Then the general consensus was all fish were stupid. It's really only been in the last 20 years that we've accrued the observational data to dispel that notion.
DeleteThere is a similar story about Cousteau and Lake Tahoe. The story is that he went down there in a sub and was so horrified that he quickly left and only said “The world is not ready for what I have seen.” There's also a cryptid of legend "Tahoe Tessie" in those parts so it stand to reason one would embellish the story of Cousteau's visit.
DeleteThanks very much for alerting me to this Lake Tahoe-themed Cousteau story, which was entirely new to me and very interesting!
DeleteIt could be 1000 pound sturgeon they are large over there
Delete